![Confused :?](./images/smilies/icon_confused.gif)
Now, don't ask me the whys or the wherefors. I'm not really sure why he needs to do what he is trying to do, but he tells me 64 works fine. Adding in the 65th field to the output derivation craters the job. And no, I don't know the exact error message. Yet. And it's probably not a coincidence that the limit seemingly is a power of two.
![Wink :wink:](./images/smilies/icon_wink.gif)
I'll take a closer look at the job and see about alternate approaches on Tuesday, but right now I'm just curious if anyone else has seen or heard of an issue like this.