Problem with checkpoints when jobs in run in parallel
Moderators: chulett, rschirm, roy
-
- Participant
- Posts: 26
- Joined: Tue Dec 18, 2007 6:31 am
UtilityFatalToLog was not available.I tried with UtilityAbortToLog.But it didn't help.It was like
ExceptionHAndler --->Notification --->UtilityAbortToLog.
But the sequencer didn't send any mail when it stopped.
The message given as input param for UtilityAbortToLog was not there in the log.
I think Exception handler is not triggered,if the sequencer receives a stop request and thats why its not aborting.
ExceptionHAndler --->Notification --->UtilityAbortToLog.
But the sequencer didn't send any mail when it stopped.
The message given as input param for UtilityAbortToLog was not there in the log.
I think Exception handler is not triggered,if the sequencer receives a stop request and thats why its not aborting.
-
- Participant
- Posts: 54607
- Joined: Wed Oct 23, 2002 10:52 pm
- Location: Sydney, Australia
- Contact:
As Craig said, you need an Abort situation. Even to trigger the Exception Handler. And it won't be triggered at all if the activity that fails has an explicit failure trigger.
IBM Software Services Group
Any contribution to this forum is my own opinion and does not necessarily reflect any position that IBM may hold.
Any contribution to this forum is my own opinion and does not necessarily reflect any position that IBM may hold.