![Confused :?](./images/smilies/icon_confused.gif)
Scheduling through Datastage
Moderators: chulett, rschirm, roy
-
- Participant
- Posts: 54607
- Joined: Wed Oct 23, 2002 10:52 pm
- Location: Sydney, Australia
- Contact:
It may be that the forced closure of the hashed file (by UVFIXFILE) has re-synchronized the hashed file header and the in-memory copy - the item that was causing the "load imbalance" to be detected. But I still can't see how this (UVFIXFILE in trace mode) would interfere with successful storage of the JOBPARAMINSTS record in the hashed file.
![Confused :?](./images/smilies/icon_confused.gif)
![Confused :?](./images/smilies/icon_confused.gif)
IBM Software Services Group
Any contribution to this forum is my own opinion and does not necessarily reflect any position that IBM may hold.
Any contribution to this forum is my own opinion and does not necessarily reflect any position that IBM may hold.