Sequencer Should wait and check for abort
Moderators: chulett, rschirm, roy
-
- Participant
- Posts: 232
- Joined: Fri Sep 30, 2005 4:52 am
- Contact:
-
- Participant
- Posts: 232
- Joined: Fri Sep 30, 2005 4:52 am
- Contact:
But i think it will show the status of sequence completed sucessfully at end.kumar_s wrote:For this you wont be even need to include the terminator stage. Just "check Automatically handle that fail". Make the 5 job activities independent.
and i think siva dont want that status of sequence.
and as he is runing jobs parallely then he dont need even sequencer also, Just he has to remove terminator activity.
Thanks,
Anupam
Re: Sequencer Should wait and check for abort
Define 'act accordingly'. That will help cut down on the speculation.120267 wrote:But it should not be the case ,it has to wait for all the five jobs to finish and finally check for the status and act accordingly.
-craig
"You can never have too many knives" -- Logan Nine Fingers
"You can never have too many knives" -- Logan Nine Fingers
Anupam,
I tried your way,But I want the sequencer to be aborted .But the sequencer is not aborting as per the suggestion made by you.It just throws warning.
I have to wait till all the jobs complete and finally check for abort and have to abort the sequencer if any one job aborts.I am also getting one info logged in DS ".....JobControl (@Coordinator): Note: Sequencer 'Sequencer_49' was entered, but never exited"
I tried your way,But I want the sequencer to be aborted .But the sequencer is not aborting as per the suggestion made by you.It just throws warning.
I have to wait till all the jobs complete and finally check for abort and have to abort the sequencer if any one job aborts.I am also getting one info logged in DS ".....JobControl (@Coordinator): Note: Sequencer 'Sequencer_49' was entered, but never exited"
With Love,
«·´`·.(*·.¸(`·.¸ ¸.·´)¸.·*).·´`·»
«.......>>>> Siva.G<<<<......»
«·´`·.(¸.·*(¸.·´ `·.¸)*·.¸).·´`·»
«·´`·.(*·.¸(`·.¸ ¸.·´)¸.·*).·´`·»
«.......>>>> Siva.G<<<<......»
«·´`·.(¸.·*(¸.·´ `·.¸)*·.¸).·´`·»
-
- Participant
- Posts: 232
- Joined: Fri Sep 30, 2005 4:52 am
- Contact:
yes anupam i am testing in test server only...But in my case i am using loop activity which may trigger all 5 or even one based on my routine output.So the sequencer property ALL wont work here.So is there any other way to achive this.
With Love,
«·´`·.(*·.¸(`·.¸ ¸.·´)¸.·*).·´`·»
«.......>>>> Siva.G<<<<......»
«·´`·.(¸.·*(¸.·´ `·.¸)*·.¸).·´`·»
«·´`·.(*·.¸(`·.¸ ¸.·´)¸.·*).·´`·»
«.......>>>> Siva.G<<<<......»
«·´`·.(¸.·*(¸.·´ `·.¸)*·.¸).·´`·»
-
- Participant
- Posts: 54607
- Joined: Wed Oct 23, 2002 10:52 pm
- Location: Sydney, Australia
- Contact:
The Terminator activity has a "wait" option, implemented as a check box. However, a Terminator is the "end of the line" - it does not support output links, so you can not then go on to any "act accordingly". You need to re-think your design.
IBM Software Services Group
Any contribution to this forum is my own opinion and does not necessarily reflect any position that IBM may hold.
Any contribution to this forum is my own opinion and does not necessarily reflect any position that IBM may hold.