We decided it might be a legal hassle. If you posted IBM always beating Sun even though the servers were not the issue. Maybe they had EMC drives and the disk drives caused these performance gains.
How do you compare apples to apples? EtlStats along with hardware profiles could produce good stats. We are at the mercy of the users being honest.
Not sure how many EtlStats users are willing to share this information but I would be open to hosting it. Let me know if you are interested by posing to this thread. Maybe we should do a poll.
How to measure performance?
Moderators: chulett, rschirm, roy
-
- Participant
- Posts: 54607
- Joined: Wed Oct 23, 2002 10:52 pm
- Location: Sydney, Australia
- Contact:
Re: Has been The performance statistic report built??
As I have posted many times, rows/sec is an almost meaningless metric. It's only valuable if you can guarantee homogeneous row sizes and you can guarantee that "all else is equal". It never is.jusami25 wrote:I'm looking for any numbers or a kind of benchmark comparison for my rows/second number.
Prefer elapsed time, since the KPI is usually the ability to meet a particular load window.
If you MUST have a rate, use something like MB/minute.
IBM Software Services Group
Any contribution to this forum is my own opinion and does not necessarily reflect any position that IBM may hold.
Any contribution to this forum is my own opinion and does not necessarily reflect any position that IBM may hold.