We recently upgraded to DS 7.5.0.5 Enterprise edision from DS 6.0.1 Server Edition. We have some batch jobs ( All server jobs) in old version.
We performed integrate testing in DEV(DS 7.5.0.5 EE), it went well without any warnings.
When comes to production, one of a server job in a batch finished with following warning.
DataStage Job 99 Phantom 32272
Creating file "SDKSequences" as Type 2, Modulo 1, Separation 1.
Creating file "D_SDKSequences" as Type 3, Modulo 1, Separation 2.
Added "@ID", the default record for Retrieve, to "D_SDKSequences".
DataStage Phantom Finished
I guess something went wrong with Hashfiles ( length and display-length mismatch).
Could anyone help in figure-out what exactly the problem is.
Phantom 32272 Warning
Moderators: chulett, rschirm, roy
-
- Participant
- Posts: 123
- Joined: Wed May 18, 2005 7:41 am
- Location: USA
Phantom 32272 Warning
Regards
VS
VS
Satish,
the SDK persistent sequence calls use that hash file for storing data. Since this was the first time that any of the routines was called it created this file - you will not see this message again in this project. It is not an error, just an informational message.
the SDK persistent sequence calls use that hash file for storing data. Since this was the first time that any of the routines was called it created this file - you will not see this message again in this project. It is not an error, just an informational message.
<a href=http://www.worldcommunitygrid.org/team/ ... TZ9H4CGVP1 target="WCGWin">
</a>
</a>
-
- Participant
- Posts: 123
- Joined: Wed May 18, 2005 7:41 am
- Location: USA
-
- Participant
- Posts: 54607
- Joined: Wed Oct 23, 2002 10:52 pm
- Location: Sydney, Australia
- Contact:
It's logged as a Warning only because it's an "unusual" event. And, as Arnd stated, you won't see it again in the current project, unless you delete the hashed file SDKSequences (not recommended).
IBM Software Services Group
Any contribution to this forum is my own opinion and does not necessarily reflect any position that IBM may hold.
Any contribution to this forum is my own opinion and does not necessarily reflect any position that IBM may hold.
-
- Participant
- Posts: 123
- Joined: Wed May 18, 2005 7:41 am
- Location: USA