Hi
We are using the restartability feature in our sequences
However since we fetching the parameters a control table to pass on to subsequent sequence - the values between an abort and rerun dont necessarily match, as a result of which the following warning message crops up
JobControl (@Coordinator): The current job run does not have the same parameters as its checkpoint record.
The checkpointed parameter values were:
LoadId=1 [current run=2]
and causes the sequence to abort.
Ex
Sequence main <checkpointed>
-routine activity<not checkpointed>
-user variable
-Sequence1<checkpointed>
-Sequence2<checkpointed>
-routine activity<not checkpointed>
Can we supress this warning using a message handler/Is there any other method to handle this?
Restartabilty issue due to invocations with diff parameters
Moderators: chulett, rschirm, roy
-
- Premium Member
- Posts: 68
- Joined: Sat Feb 05, 2005 4:59 am
- Location: India
-
- Participant
- Posts: 3593
- Joined: Thu Jan 23, 2003 5:25 pm
- Location: Australia, Melbourne
- Contact:
The message handler only works on parallel jobs, not sequence jobs. I'm surprised it aborts your job, I thought it was a non fatal warning message. You could redesign your load id logic so it is retrieved from within the sequence via a Set Variables stage. For example storing it in a configuration text file and retrieving and incrementing it each time it runs.
Certus Solutions
Blog: Tooling Around in the InfoSphere
Twitter: @vmcburney
LinkedIn:Vincent McBurney LinkedIn
Blog: Tooling Around in the InfoSphere
Twitter: @vmcburney
LinkedIn:Vincent McBurney LinkedIn
-
- Participant
- Posts: 54607
- Joined: Wed Oct 23, 2002 10:52 pm
- Location: Sydney, Australia
- Contact:
A restarted job sequence MUST use all the same parameter values as the prior incomplete run. This is the only way that you can prevent this warning and abort from occurring.
(Well, there's one other way, and that's to recompile so that all the checkpoints are lost and to run the entire sequence again.)
(Well, there's one other way, and that's to recompile so that all the checkpoints are lost and to run the entire sequence again.)
IBM Software Services Group
Any contribution to this forum is my own opinion and does not necessarily reflect any position that IBM may hold.
Any contribution to this forum is my own opinion and does not necessarily reflect any position that IBM may hold.
-
- Premium Member
- Posts: 68
- Joined: Sat Feb 05, 2005 4:59 am
- Location: India