Any idea what the folowing phantom error is ? I am using Datastage 7.5 EE on Linux.
Contents of phantom output file =>
DataStage Job 298 Phantom 10819
writeSocket() returned 39
Program "DSD.OshMonitor": Line 322, Variable "finished" previously undefined. Zero used.
writeSocket() returned 16
DataStage Phantom Finished.
Phantom error 10819
Moderators: chulett, rschirm, roy
Hi,
10819 is not an error code!
this is what's wrong:
you might also need some patch/es regarding your job monitor so check that as well.
(I know solaris needs the patch)
IHTH,
10819 is not an error code!
this is what's wrong:
it really sound like a support call to me.writeSocket() returned 39
Program "DSD.OshMonitor": Line 322, Variable "finished" previously undefined. Zero used.
writeSocket() returned 16
you might also need some patch/es regarding your job monitor so check that as well.
(I know solaris needs the patch)
IHTH,
Roy R.
Time is money but when you don't have money time is all you can afford.
Search before posting:)
Join the DataStagers team effort at:
http://www.worldcommunitygrid.org
Time is money but when you don't have money time is all you can afford.
Search before posting:)
Join the DataStagers team effort at:
http://www.worldcommunitygrid.org
-
- Participant
- Posts: 54607
- Joined: Wed Oct 23, 2002 10:52 pm
- Location: Sydney, Australia
- Contact:
"phantom" is DataStage's term for "background process". 10819 is the process ID (user number) of the process reporting the error. The actual error message suggests what the problem is and a possible underlying reason that writeSocket() failed is that the listener on the other end of the socket (JobMonApp) was not running. Solution seems to be to check whether JobMonApp is running and start it if it isn't.
IBM Software Services Group
Any contribution to this forum is my own opinion and does not necessarily reflect any position that IBM may hold.
Any contribution to this forum is my own opinion and does not necessarily reflect any position that IBM may hold.
-
- Participant
- Posts: 54607
- Joined: Wed Oct 23, 2002 10:52 pm
- Location: Sydney, Australia
- Contact:
That would seem to be a logical conclusion. Currently I have no way to verify it. Get in touch with your support provider, who may be able to source the 9.1 adapter for you.
IBM Software Services Group
Any contribution to this forum is my own opinion and does not necessarily reflect any position that IBM may hold.
Any contribution to this forum is my own opinion and does not necessarily reflect any position that IBM may hold.