Mismatches in job executables

Post questions here relative to DataStage Enterprise/PX Edition for such areas as Parallel job design, Parallel datasets, BuildOps, Wrappers, etc.

Moderators: chulett, rschirm, roy

Post Reply
Madhumitha_Raghunathan
Premium Member
Premium Member
Posts: 59
Joined: Fri Apr 22, 2011 8:02 am

Mismatches in job executables

Post by Madhumitha_Raghunathan »

Hi,

we are trying to syncronize code between 2 environments.
Since we have only executables on one environment we are currently comparing the executables
minus binaries of both the environments.

Most of the jobs have a source DB, a transformer (direct mapping) and a target DB.

We have been consistently getting the following difference in many executables for which we are not able to find the exact cause:

ENV1:

## General options
[ident('Transformer_3'); jobmon_ident('Transformer_3')]
## Inputs
0< 'SRC_stge1:DSLink2.v'
## Outputs
0> [] 'Transformer_3:insert.v'
;


ENV2:

## General options
[ident('Transformer_3'); jobmon_ident('Transformer_3')]
## Inputs
0< [] 'SRC_stge1:DSLink2.v'
## Outputs
0> [] 'Transformer_3:insert.v'
;

This is the only difference we are getting in those jobs and we are not able to decide if this difference will have any impact on the data or functionality. Can someone help.
Thanks,
Madhumitha
Sampath
Participant
Posts: 21
Joined: Tue Apr 05, 2005 2:03 am

Re: Mismatches in job executables

Post by Sampath »

check the environments setting between to servers.
Regards,
Sampath
ray.wurlod
Participant
Posts: 54607
Joined: Wed Oct 23, 2002 10:52 pm
Location: Sydney, Australia
Contact:

Post by ray.wurlod »

These jobs are functionally identical.

Curiously enough, I can't bring to mind what the [] in the link (data set) definition means, but I can recall that, if it's empty, there's no additional operation there.
IBM Software Services Group
Any contribution to this forum is my own opinion and does not necessarily reflect any position that IBM may hold.
Madhumitha_Raghunathan
Premium Member
Premium Member
Posts: 59
Joined: Fri Apr 22, 2011 8:02 am

Post by Madhumitha_Raghunathan »

Thank you so much. We compared the data generated by both sets of codes and there were no discrepancies.
Thanks,
Madhumitha
Post Reply