The view adapter has a binding for the non-existent destinat
Moderators: chulett, rschirm, roy
The view adapter has a binding for the non-existent destinat
DS job has lookup stage with one i/p link one o/p link and 3 reference links.
One of the three reference links has fl_dt and row_id fields with fl_dt as key.
to change the logic the key column fl_dt in reference link was replaced with src_id.
I got desired results but job is finished with two warnings.
Here are the warnings
Lookup_1043: When checking operator: On input data set 1: The view adapter has a binding for the non-existent destination field "FL_DT".
Lookup_1043: When checking operator: On input data set 2: The view adapter has a binding for the non-existent destination field "FL_DT".
The job is running on 4 node configuration.
I was not able to fix this warnings, then included fl_dt in the reference link as key field..but still getting above two warnings.
Not sure how to fix...
guys pl help...
One of the three reference links has fl_dt and row_id fields with fl_dt as key.
to change the logic the key column fl_dt in reference link was replaced with src_id.
I got desired results but job is finished with two warnings.
Here are the warnings
Lookup_1043: When checking operator: On input data set 1: The view adapter has a binding for the non-existent destination field "FL_DT".
Lookup_1043: When checking operator: On input data set 2: The view adapter has a binding for the non-existent destination field "FL_DT".
The job is running on 4 node configuration.
I was not able to fix this warnings, then included fl_dt in the reference link as key field..but still getting above two warnings.
Not sure how to fix...
guys pl help...
-
- Participant
- Posts: 54607
- Joined: Wed Oct 23, 2002 10:52 pm
- Location: Sydney, Australia
- Contact:
Have you managed to Search DSXchange for this particular message?
IBM Software Services Group
Any contribution to this forum is my own opinion and does not necessarily reflect any position that IBM may hold.
Any contribution to this forum is my own opinion and does not necessarily reflect any position that IBM may hold.
Hi Ray,
Yes, I tried search several times for this message, even I tried with several combination like
When checking operator: On input data set 1: The view adapter has a binding for the non-existent destination field
then tried When checking operator: On input data set 1
also tried The view adapter has a binding for the non-existent destination field
and then with On input data set 1: The view adapter has a binding for the non-existent destination field
but no luck..
What I am doing now is..I exported as .dsx and opened in ultraedit
seared dsx file for fl_dt and trying to figure out if this field name exists at inappropriate place..
I removed them and importing this job..I will execute and see what happens.. I will keep u posted..
Yes, I tried search several times for this message, even I tried with several combination like
When checking operator: On input data set 1: The view adapter has a binding for the non-existent destination field
then tried When checking operator: On input data set 1
also tried The view adapter has a binding for the non-existent destination field
and then with On input data set 1: The view adapter has a binding for the non-existent destination field
but no luck..
What I am doing now is..I exported as .dsx and opened in ultraedit
seared dsx file for fl_dt and trying to figure out if this field name exists at inappropriate place..
I removed them and importing this job..I will execute and see what happens.. I will keep u posted..
-
- Participant
- Posts: 29
- Joined: Mon Nov 20, 2006 7:17 am
- Location: Melbourne
-
- Premium Member
- Posts: 730
- Joined: Tue Nov 04, 2008 10:14 am
- Location: Bangalore
-
- Premium Member
- Posts: 730
- Joined: Tue Nov 04, 2008 10:14 am
- Location: Bangalore