Performance comparison of FTP Stage - Server and Parallel
Posted: Tue May 01, 2007 3:18 pm
Hi,
We are currently working on Server Edition and are planning to move to Enterprise Edition in the near future.
Recently we tried to ftp a file from Mainframes using the FTP stage. It turned out to be a bit pretty slow. It processed at about 120 rows/sec as shown in the performance statistics.
We are just curious to know if the parallel job could give a better performance with the FTP stage that is in the parallel canvas. If anyone have tried this kind of comparison, please share your information. Also, if you had used parallel FTP stage to read a file from Mainframes, then what was the speed / performance at which it had processed?
Thanks.
We are currently working on Server Edition and are planning to move to Enterprise Edition in the near future.
Recently we tried to ftp a file from Mainframes using the FTP stage. It turned out to be a bit pretty slow. It processed at about 120 rows/sec as shown in the performance statistics.
We are just curious to know if the parallel job could give a better performance with the FTP stage that is in the parallel canvas. If anyone have tried this kind of comparison, please share your information. Also, if you had used parallel FTP stage to read a file from Mainframes, then what was the speed / performance at which it had processed?
Thanks.