Paralllel job

Post questions here relative to DataStage Enterprise/PX Edition for such areas as Parallel job design, Parallel datasets, BuildOps, Wrappers, etc.

Moderators: chulett, rschirm, roy

Post Reply
bhargava129189
Participant
Posts: 18
Joined: Tue Nov 15, 2005 9:36 am

Paralllel job

Post by bhargava129189 »

I am not able to find out the reason why i am not able to use job parameters in job.

i am getting the following error.

##E TFCP 000001 08:28:37(002) <transform> Error when checking composite operator: Unexpected tokens: ; [line 14,character 7].
##E TFCP 000012 08:28:37(003) <transform> Error when checking composite operator: Invalid local variable declaration: ; [line 14, character 7].
##E TFCP 000001 08:28:37(004) <transform> Error when checking composite operator: Unexpected tokens: ; [line 96,character 22].
##E TFCP 000027 08:28:37(005) <transform> Error when checking composite operator: Expected an operand; [line 96, character 20].
##E TFCP 000038 08:28:37(006) <transform> Error when checking composite operator: Expected semi-colon; [line 96, character 22].
##E TFSR 000019 08:28:37(007) <main_program> Could not check all operators because of previous error(s)
##E TCOS 000029 08:28:37(008) <main_program> Creation of a step finished with status = FAILED. (Nxrp_Trn_Tfs_Gos_Dtl_P2.Tfm_Insert)
thompsonp
Premium Member
Premium Member
Posts: 205
Joined: Tue Mar 01, 2005 8:41 am

Post by thompsonp »

Perhaps you could provide some more information about how you are trying to use the job parameters.

In some stages they need to be enclosed by two hashes #xxx#, and in others they do not (e.g. a transformer).
ray.wurlod
Participant
Posts: 54607
Joined: Wed Oct 23, 2002 10:52 pm
Location: Sydney, Australia
Contact:

Post by ray.wurlod »

You have not provided enough information to enable us to help. How are you declaring the parameters, and how and where in the job design are you referring to them? Precise answers are needed.
IBM Software Services Group
Any contribution to this forum is my own opinion and does not necessarily reflect any position that IBM may hold.
Post Reply