Posted: Wed May 04, 2011 2:44 am
Apologies for ambiguous statement. The question in my mind at that time wasray.wurlod wrote:No it doesn't. I understand the requirement to be "the date 6 months prior to current date". ...priyadarshikunal wrote:Depends on the definition on 6 months.
In case the date is 2011-03(-01) which will produce 2010-08(-30). Definition of 6 months remains constant but there seems to be a deviation from that definition (the result in first post and the result date after substracting 183 day).
Regards,