warning on checking operator on lookup stage

Post questions here relative to DataStage Enterprise/PX Edition for such areas as Parallel job design, Parallel datasets, BuildOps, Wrappers, etc.

Moderators: chulett, rschirm, roy

Post Reply
mayura
Participant
Posts: 40
Joined: Fri Aug 01, 2008 5:58 am
Location: Mumbai

warning on checking operator on lookup stage

Post by mayura »

When checking operator-the view adapter has a binding for the non existent destination field:
Checked all ways but warning is not removing
e.g: took new stage and coded again
tick on column thrwoing warning complation didnt worked.
Mentioned column meta data is same.

Please let me know.
Last edited by mayura on Wed Dec 12, 2012 1:15 am, edited 1 time in total.
Mayura
chulett
Charter Member
Charter Member
Posts: 43085
Joined: Tue Nov 12, 2002 4:34 pm
Location: Denver, CO

Post by chulett »

I'm sorry but is this actually a TX question? Or are you having an issue with a Parallel job and just posted in the wrong forum? I can't tell from what you've posted and your message doesn't seem to appear in any other post here.

Please clarify.
-craig

"You can never have too many knives" -- Logan Nine Fingers
mayura
Participant
Posts: 40
Joined: Fri Aug 01, 2008 5:58 am
Location: Mumbai

Post by mayura »

This is related to Parallel job.Gettting warning for lookup state column.
Checked Input/Output column and are same.Also its not speicfied as key column from source.
Mayura
chulett
Charter Member
Charter Member
Posts: 43085
Joined: Tue Nov 12, 2002 4:34 pm
Location: Denver, CO

Post by chulett »

Then off we go to the proper forum!

PX not TX. :wink:
-craig

"You can never have too many knives" -- Logan Nine Fingers
ArndW
Participant
Posts: 16318
Joined: Tue Nov 16, 2004 9:08 am
Location: Germany
Contact:

Post by ArndW »

Can you do a successful "view data" on the reference source stage? The error shows that what you've declared in the job and what is being delivered by the stage are not the same.
mayura
Participant
Posts: 40
Joined: Fri Aug 01, 2008 5:58 am
Location: Mumbai

Post by mayura »

Thanks it was resolved yerterday intself as coded again after removal of stages and link which has thrown the warning.
Mayura
Post Reply