SIGSEGV error in parallel job

Post questions here relative to DataStage Enterprise/PX Edition for such areas as Parallel job design, Parallel datasets, BuildOps, Wrappers, etc.

Moderators: chulett, rschirm, roy

Post Reply
mac4rfree
Participant
Posts: 8
Joined: Mon Feb 11, 2008 12:50 am
Location: Mumbai
Contact:

SIGSEGV error in parallel job

Post by mac4rfree »

Hi Guys,

We are facing a problem in production environment. The job is having only one stage. The stage is a stored procedure which calls the stored procedure.
The job was running fine all these days. Suddenly it is giving this error

"Operator terminated abnormally: received signal SIGSEGV"

Could anybody help me out with this?
i tried to reset the job and ran it and i am getting the same error.even after compilation am getting the same errro.

its very urgent as it is a production environment?

Thanks for ur help in advance.
mac
Nagaraj
Premium Member
Premium Member
Posts: 383
Joined: Thu Nov 08, 2007 12:32 am
Location: Bangalore

Re: SIGSEGV error in parallel job

Post by Nagaraj »

Is there any CLOB. BLOB or BFILE datatype?
mini
Participant
Posts: 13
Joined: Mon Aug 13, 2007 4:54 am
Location: US

Post by mini »

No there is no such datatype.
samunik
Premium Member
Premium Member
Posts: 10
Joined: Fri Oct 08, 2004 11:10 am
Location: USA

Re: SIGSEGV error in parallel job

Post by samunik »

Try force compling the job.

If that does not work then I would start looking at the connection which is made to the database server to execute the stored proc.

The info provided here is too limited to point to a better resolution.
Nagaraj
Premium Member
Premium Member
Posts: 383
Joined: Thu Nov 08, 2007 12:32 am
Location: Bangalore

Post by Nagaraj »

I go this error once when i tried loading the data to a column which was not big enough to handle the incoming size, may you can get some idea with this.
mac4rfree
Participant
Posts: 8
Joined: Mon Feb 11, 2008 12:50 am
Location: Mumbai
Contact:

Post by mac4rfree »

samunik,,

Compiling is taking place fine.. then why we need to do force compiling?
and wat more information do u need to solve this issue??Please inform me..i ll post them..
wat are the connections do we need to check?? cud you please explain more..


nagaraj,,

This job was running fine all these days.. if the data type of the input is large as ur saying then it wud have created a problem way back... anywy i ll check into it..

thanks for ur reply guys.. hope to solve this issue with ur help sooner
ray.wurlod
Participant
Posts: 54607
Joined: Wed Oct 23, 2002 10:52 pm
Location: Sydney, Australia
Contact:

Post by ray.wurlod »

Please maintain a professional standard of written English at DSXchange. This helps those for whom English is not a first language.
IBM Software Services Group
Any contribution to this forum is my own opinion and does not necessarily reflect any position that IBM may hold.
mac4rfree
Participant
Posts: 8
Joined: Mon Feb 11, 2008 12:50 am
Location: Mumbai
Contact:

Post by mac4rfree »

point taken ray.. sorry guys this is the first time i am using any forum..
I will see to it in the future..
srikanth18
Participant
Posts: 4
Joined: Mon Nov 30, 2009 10:10 am

Re: SIGSEGV error in parallel job

Post by srikanth18 »

IF U HAVE A 'DRS' STAGE IN A JOB,AND IF THERE IS A LOT OF LINKS CONNECTED TO THE 'DRS' THEN SPLIT LINKS INTO 2 DRS STAGES AND RUN THE JOB. GOOD LUCK
rupeshg
Premium Member
Premium Member
Posts: 60
Joined: Thu Dec 22, 2005 6:02 am
Location: United Kingdom

Post by rupeshg »

Was the Procedure or tables it referes/writes to are modified recently?

Its the segmentation error. Procedure may not have write access to some of the tables or table size is full or database file size is not defined as incremental or may be it tries to write in non-nullable column. (I am assuming Oracle Procedure)

Please check if any of these is causing the problem.
ray.wurlod
Participant
Posts: 54607
Joined: Wed Oct 23, 2002 10:52 pm
Location: Sydney, Australia
Contact:

Post by ray.wurlod »

I wonder whether it's still very urgent three months on?
:?
IBM Software Services Group
Any contribution to this forum is my own opinion and does not necessarily reflect any position that IBM may hold.
Post Reply