Row Count.

Post questions here relative to DataStage Enterprise/PX Edition for such areas as Parallel job design, Parallel datasets, BuildOps, Wrappers, etc.

Moderators: chulett, rschirm, roy

Post Reply
sambit
Participant
Posts: 52
Joined: Mon Sep 05, 2005 4:59 am

Row Count.

Post by sambit »

Is there a way I can take the count of the links from my previous run of a job? The job was run again yesterday after 1 month and the -linkinfo is giving me the count of the recent most run. Also there is no information on the row count from the logs.
Thanks !!!
Sambit
chulett
Charter Member
Charter Member
Posts: 43085
Joined: Tue Nov 12, 2002 4:34 pm
Location: Denver, CO

Post by chulett »

The only place you'll find metrics from a previous run is in the job's log. What makes you sat there's "no information on the row count" there?
-craig

"You can never have too many knives" -- Logan Nine Fingers
sambit
Participant
Posts: 52
Joined: Mon Sep 05, 2005 4:59 am

Post by sambit »

In the job log I can see all the details except for the no. of rows processed.
Thanks !!!
Sambit
Sreenivasulu
Premium Member
Premium Member
Posts: 892
Joined: Thu Oct 16, 2003 5:18 am

Post by Sreenivasulu »

In fact its the other way round. Joblog gives more accurate info than linkinfo. This information is based on my experience

Regards
Sreeni
sambit
Participant
Posts: 52
Joined: Mon Sep 05, 2005 4:59 am

Post by sambit »

May be. But the problem here is how to get the row count. The log has the orchestrate, configuration details and also the peek values but doesn't have any information on the row count.


This is job is not writing to any file/DS/tables. It just has peek stages as the final output. Is this the reason why there is no details of row count in the log?
Thanks !!!
Sambit
chulett
Charter Member
Charter Member
Posts: 43085
Joined: Tue Nov 12, 2002 4:34 pm
Location: Denver, CO

Post by chulett »

Yes.
-craig

"You can never have too many knives" -- Logan Nine Fingers
ray.wurlod
Participant
Posts: 54607
Joined: Wed Oct 23, 2002 10:52 pm
Location: Sydney, Australia
Contact:

Post by ray.wurlod »

Is there a message in the log that the peek operator consumed nnn rows?
(The key word here is "consumed".)
IBM Software Services Group
Any contribution to this forum is my own opinion and does not necessarily reflect any position that IBM may hold.
chulett
Charter Member
Charter Member
Posts: 43085
Joined: Tue Nov 12, 2002 4:34 pm
Location: Denver, CO

Post by chulett »

I didn't see any such when I checked my logs, just the actual dumped 'records' from the Peek stage. Is this functionality, optional or otherwise, that was added in 8.x?
-craig

"You can never have too many knives" -- Logan Nine Fingers
sambit
Participant
Posts: 52
Joined: Mon Sep 05, 2005 4:59 am

Post by sambit »

I am guessing it is something introduced in 8x. What do you think, Ray?
Thanks !!!
Sambit
ray.wurlod
Participant
Posts: 54607
Joined: Wed Oct 23, 2002 10:52 pm
Location: Sydney, Australia
Contact:

Post by ray.wurlod »

Depends. What do you mean by "it"?
IBM Software Services Group
Any contribution to this forum is my own opinion and does not necessarily reflect any position that IBM may hold.
Post Reply