80011 and libgciudt6.so

Post questions here relative to DataStage Enterprise/PX Edition for such areas as Parallel job design, Parallel datasets, BuildOps, Wrappers, etc.

Moderators: chulett, rschirm, roy

Post Reply
Andet
Charter Member
Charter Member
Posts: 63
Joined: Mon Nov 01, 2004 9:40 am
Location: Clayton, MO

80011 and libgciudt6.so

Post by Andet »

moving from one data device to another, Datastage was brought down, the /opt/dstage/Ascential filesystem was copied -p by root to the new device.
now cannot log into any client, including admin, by any id, including dsadm.
can start and stop the server using /bin/uv; can get into universe using uvsh. bin/uv gives the cannot load libgciudt6.so message. DSHOME is set, dsenv was not changed; I verified the setuids were all okay (that's why we got the SA to do the copy.

all permissions look the same except for a few directories now have rwxrwsr-x instead of rwxrwxr-x which shouldn't make a difference.

any suggestions?

thanks,

Ande
ray.wurlod
Participant
Posts: 54607
Joined: Wed Oct 23, 2002 10:52 pm
Location: Sydney, Australia
Contact:

Post by ray.wurlod »

Apart from doing it properly (not with an operating system copy command)?

Not really.

Does bin/dssh work instead of bin/uv ?
IBM Software Services Group
Any contribution to this forum is my own opinion and does not necessarily reflect any position that IBM may hold.
Andet
Charter Member
Charter Member
Posts: 63
Joined: Mon Nov 01, 2004 9:40 am
Location: Clayton, MO

Post by Andet »

uvsh works just fine.
why do you think a cp -p by root would not work? Datastage is not sensitive to devices...

Ande
Ande

"So, you think this will work?"
ray.wurlod
Participant
Posts: 54607
Joined: Wed Oct 23, 2002 10:52 pm
Location: Sydney, Australia
Contact:

Post by ray.wurlod »

Because there are "system table" entries that refer to objects by pathname. Unless the new pathnames are identical to the old, there will be grief.
IBM Software Services Group
Any contribution to this forum is my own opinion and does not necessarily reflect any position that IBM may hold.
chulett
Charter Member
Charter Member
Posts: 43085
Joined: Tue Nov 12, 2002 4:34 pm
Location: Denver, CO

Post by chulett »

Don't those "pathnames" also include the system name and/or IP address? :?
-craig

"You can never have too many knives" -- Logan Nine Fingers
ray.wurlod
Participant
Posts: 54607
Joined: Wed Oct 23, 2002 10:52 pm
Location: Sydney, Australia
Contact:

Post by ray.wurlod »

Not in version 7 (if my memory serves me correctly).
IBM Software Services Group
Any contribution to this forum is my own opinion and does not necessarily reflect any position that IBM may hold.
Andet
Charter Member
Charter Member
Posts: 63
Joined: Mon Nov 01, 2004 9:40 am
Location: Clayton, MO

Post by Andet »

copying the whole filesystem.
no new names or directories. dismounting old, mounting new.
I don't see anything sensitive to devices.

any suggestions?
Ande

"So, you think this will work?"
Post Reply