C++ routine error

prasson_ibm · Post by **prasson_ibm** » Sat Jul 11, 2009 9:39 pm

chulett wrote:Is this still true? And is the error exactly the same? If not, post it.

This code is working fine for case: 1,2,3,4,5 but in the case of 6,30 my job get aborts

yes error is same when i call case-6,job aborts with error mesaage

"APT_CombinedOperatorController(2),0: Operator terminated abnormally: received signal SIGSEGV"

ArndW · Post by **ArndW** » Sun Jul 12, 2009 2:04 am

Do you get better output when you turn off operator combination? (APT_DISABLE_COMBINATION set to "true").