Data loss in the sequential file when job aborts
Moderators: chulett, rschirm, roy
-
- Participant
- Posts: 54607
- Joined: Wed Oct 23, 2002 10:52 pm
- Location: Sydney, Australia
- Contact:
-
- Participant
- Posts: 54607
- Joined: Wed Oct 23, 2002 10:52 pm
- Location: Sydney, Australia
- Contact:
This is a stupid requirement. What if the job aborts and you can not write to the sequential file because the disk has filled? There is no way that you can avoid "data loss in the sequential file" in this case.
Resist stupid requirements.
Resist stupid requirements.
IBM Software Services Group
Any contribution to this forum is my own opinion and does not necessarily reflect any position that IBM may hold.
Any contribution to this forum is my own opinion and does not necessarily reflect any position that IBM may hold.