Moving DataStage from SAN to NAS

Post questions here relative to DataStage Enterprise/PX Edition for such areas as Parallel job design, Parallel datasets, BuildOps, Wrappers, etc.

Moderators: chulett, rschirm, roy

Post Reply
lgharis
Premium Member
Premium Member
Posts: 56
Joined: Wed May 26, 2004 10:08 am
Location: Dallas, TX

Moving DataStage from SAN to NAS

Post by lgharis »

This is created an FYI for others who might experience this issue.

The Unix SA was copying the DataStage software and Projects as well as other filesystems from SAN disks to NAS disks. Server jobs ran just fine but Parallel jobs failed with "main program: Fatal error: Duplicate name registration for: splitsubrec, APT_SplitSubRecOperator".

It was finally determined that the filesystems were copied in such a way as to NOT create the symbolic links. Rather all of the files only were copied. After stopping the DataStage daemon again, they recopied the files and all symbolic links. Parallel jobs ran successfully after this was done.

There are many symbolic links in the PXEngine/lib directory. I am sure there are others also.
Leroy Gharis

Dallas, TX
ray.wurlod
Participant
Posts: 54607
Joined: Wed Oct 23, 2002 10:52 pm
Location: Sydney, Australia
Contact:

Post by ray.wurlod »

There are many dangers inherent in moving DataStage projects without due care and diligence. Thanks for posting this particular one.
IBM Software Services Group
Any contribution to this forum is my own opinion and does not necessarily reflect any position that IBM may hold.
lgharis
Premium Member
Premium Member
Posts: 56
Joined: Wed May 26, 2004 10:08 am
Location: Dallas, TX

Post by lgharis »

Update on using NAS vs SAN.
The application was experiencing performance issues after about 3 months or so. When we all sat down and thought about it, it was determined the problems started about the time we moved to NAS. We stopped everything, including the DS daemon, and had the SA copy to necessary filesystems from NAS back to SAN. All was restarted and performance issues subsided.

It seems that SAN is recommended by the vendor. If you wish to use NAS there is apparently some special considerations involved to elminate issues. We have decided to stick with SAN.
Leroy Gharis

Dallas, TX
Post Reply