Hi,
May I know why not to use Server shared container on MPP environment. Won't Datastage have a common repository accross all the CPUs?
Server shared container on MPP
Moderators: chulett, rschirm, roy
I think, the reason lies in the very architecture of the two systems and the nature of a shared container. SMP uses a single shared memory irrespective of how many cpus are connected to it. The result of the shared container resides in the shared memory and whatever cpu requires the shared contrainer, requests for it.
Where as MPP's are, briefly, many computers hooked up for a massive single unit. It might not be able to work in the same way as the shared container was originally designed to work in and hence the limitation.
I might be wrong, but need someone to confirm it.
Where as MPP's are, briefly, many computers hooked up for a massive single unit. It might not be able to work in the same way as the shared container was originally designed to work in and hence the limitation.
I might be wrong, but need someone to confirm it.
Creativity is allowing yourself to make mistakes. Art is knowing which ones to keep.
Here it is. Though he haven't given any strong asertion about that, it seems it working.
viewtopic.php?t=85355&highlight=mpp+shared+container
Even you can find Ray is pointing to his post in this.
viewtopic.php?t=85353&highlight=mpp+shared+container
viewtopic.php?t=85355&highlight=mpp+shared+container
Even you can find Ray is pointing to his post in this.
viewtopic.php?t=85353&highlight=mpp+shared+container
Go for it then. As I said before, I wouldnt go for something thats a trial, or might break someday. If it does, you cannot even go back to IBM, as they will point out to the same line that Craig quoted, that it is not supported.
Creativity is allowing yourself to make mistakes. Art is knowing which ones to keep.