No, probably just your dataset descriptor and sequential file are in the same directory. You should try writing your sequential file to the directory pointed to by the resource disk setting in your APT_CONFIG file. That way you are comparing performance on the same disk partition and removing potentional I/O differences from the equation.splayer wrote:...Both versions output the file to the same folder...
Job using dataset files is slower than sequential files
Moderators: chulett, rschirm, roy
<a href=http://www.worldcommunitygrid.org/team/ ... TZ9H4CGVP1 target="WCGWin">
</a>
</a>
I've read in another post that datasets containing bounded-length varchar fields can grow to be be quite large as they allocate almost the full amount of space defined, even when only a few characters of the varchar field are actually used.
Is the total size of your datasets much larger than your sequential file? (i.e. could the I/O involved writing out a larger set of files be the cause of your performance discrepancy?)
Is the total size of your datasets much larger than your sequential file? (i.e. could the I/O involved writing out a larger set of files be the cause of your performance discrepancy?)
Arndw, when I changed my resourcedisk path to the Datasets folder where datasets are created, the time taken for sequential file was the same as for data set files, 69secs. So depending on the folder, performance varies. Do you have any idea as to why it might be?
I would think that dataset version should at least be a few seconds faster.
I would think that dataset version should at least be a few seconds faster.
splayer - look at the filesystems and options used for your two partitions.
<a href=http://www.worldcommunitygrid.org/team/ ... TZ9H4CGVP1 target="WCGWin">
</a>
</a>
-
- Participant
- Posts: 54607
- Joined: Wed Oct 23, 2002 10:52 pm
- Location: Sydney, Australia
- Contact:
-
- Participant
- Posts: 54607
- Joined: Wed Oct 23, 2002 10:52 pm
- Location: Sydney, Australia
- Contact:
More usually Storage ARRAY Network - an array of storage devices (disks) connected with intelligent controllers so that they can be managed as a single entity or partitioned as required.DSguruji wrote:Storage Area Network
IBM Software Services Group
Any contribution to this forum is my own opinion and does not necessarily reflect any position that IBM may hold.
Any contribution to this forum is my own opinion and does not necessarily reflect any position that IBM may hold.