Difference between Server and Enterprise Edition
Moderators: chulett, rschirm, roy
Difference between Server and Enterprise Edition
Hi,
I have been working DS Server Edition in years but not experience in Parallel Extender.
Now a project is about to come using DS parallel extender.
Can I do it like after reading technical document or do I need a training?
Please give me advice or highlight on differences between these two editions.
Thanks,
(Pls direct me if there is any topic already in the forum)
I have been working DS Server Edition in years but not experience in Parallel Extender.
Now a project is about to come using DS parallel extender.
Can I do it like after reading technical document or do I need a training?
Please give me advice or highlight on differences between these two editions.
Thanks,
(Pls direct me if there is any topic already in the forum)
Re: Difference between Server and Enterprise Edition
check this out.Ocean wrote:Hi,
I have been working DS Server Edition in years but not experience in Parallel Extender.
Now a project is about to come using DS parallel extender.
Can I do it like after reading technical document or do I need a training?
Please give me advice or highlight on differences between these two editions.
Thanks,
(Pls direct me if there is any topic already in the forum)
viewtopic.php?t=88879
There are a number of threads out there regarding the differences between Server and Parallel.
The common designer canvas can misleas the new and unwary developer into thinking that the two products, Server and Parallel, differ mainly in their performance. This is a big mistake and an easy enough error to make - I've done so as well since I've been working with Server since it's inception.
I have seen jobs that were obviously written in PX with a Server mindset and the jobs usually are neither particularly efficient and as often as not they don't work correctly.
Either a course or some sort of guided instruction on the paradigm differences (I know the term is overused in the software industry, but it does apply here) is absolutely necessary in order to avoid pitfalls in designing PX jobs.
The common designer canvas can misleas the new and unwary developer into thinking that the two products, Server and Parallel, differ mainly in their performance. This is a big mistake and an easy enough error to make - I've done so as well since I've been working with Server since it's inception.
I have seen jobs that were obviously written in PX with a Server mindset and the jobs usually are neither particularly efficient and as often as not they don't work correctly.
Either a course or some sort of guided instruction on the paradigm differences (I know the term is overused in the software industry, but it does apply here) is absolutely necessary in order to avoid pitfalls in designing PX jobs.
<a href=http://www.worldcommunitygrid.org/team/ ... TZ9H4CGVP1 target="WCGWin">
</a>
</a>
-
- Participant
- Posts: 3593
- Joined: Thu Jan 23, 2003 5:25 pm
- Location: Australia, Melbourne
- Contact:
A very good point. If you look at Google Trends for the last two years the top 10 cities doing a Google search for the term "DataStage" since 2004 are:
1. Pune, India
2. Bangalore, India
3. Hyderabad, India
4. Chennai, India
5. Mumbai, India
6. Singapore, Singapore
7. New Delhi, India
8. Minneapolis, MN, USA
9. Delhi, India
10. Dallas, TX, USA
There are a huge number of people interested in DataStage in India. In fact there were 10 times as many people Googling DataStage from India as there were from the US.
1. Pune, India
2. Bangalore, India
3. Hyderabad, India
4. Chennai, India
5. Mumbai, India
6. Singapore, Singapore
7. New Delhi, India
8. Minneapolis, MN, USA
9. Delhi, India
10. Dallas, TX, USA
There are a huge number of people interested in DataStage in India. In fact there were 10 times as many people Googling DataStage from India as there were from the US.
Certus Solutions
Blog: Tooling Around in the InfoSphere
Twitter: @vmcburney
LinkedIn:Vincent McBurney LinkedIn
Blog: Tooling Around in the InfoSphere
Twitter: @vmcburney
LinkedIn:Vincent McBurney LinkedIn
-
- Participant
- Posts: 54607
- Joined: Wed Oct 23, 2002 10:52 pm
- Location: Sydney, Australia
- Contact:
-
- Participant
- Posts: 54607
- Joined: Wed Oct 23, 2002 10:52 pm
- Location: Sydney, Australia
- Contact: