Teradata Mload/Fastexport stage error

Post questions here relative to DataStage Enterprise/PX Edition for such areas as Parallel job design, Parallel datasets, BuildOps, Wrappers, etc.

Moderators: chulett, rschirm, roy

Post Reply
smuppidi
Premium Member
Premium Member
Posts: 11
Joined: Fri Mar 17, 2006 9:00 am

Teradata Mload/Fastexport stage error

Post by smuppidi »

Hello All,

I am getting the following error when using FastExport to extract data from a teradata table using MLaod stage.

**** 14:16:19 UTY8400 Error determining default character set name, code = 224

Does anybody have an idea what this error is about?

Thank you,
Satish.
bcarlson
Premium Member
Premium Member
Posts: 772
Joined: Fri Oct 01, 2004 3:06 pm
Location: Minnesota

Post by bcarlson »

I haven't seen that error before. However, have you tried using the Teradata Enterprise stage for retrieving data? That also uses FastExport for reads (FastLoad for writes). We have had much better luck using the Enterprise stage than any of the other API stages.

Brad.
smuppidi
Premium Member
Premium Member
Posts: 11
Joined: Fri Mar 17, 2006 9:00 am

Post by smuppidi »

bcarlson wrote:I haven't seen that error before. However, have you tried using the Teradata Enterprise stage for retrieving data? That also uses FastExport for reads (FastLoad for writes). We have had much better luck using the Enterprise stage than any of the other API stages.

Brad.
Thanks Brad. Now i am using the Teradata EE, it works fine. But we are extracting about 10 million records and i am afraid about the performance using Teradata EE.
If you have any heavy volume extraction using Teradata EE version please share with me, that would greatly help.

Thanks,
Satish.
ray.wurlod
Participant
Posts: 54607
Joined: Wed Oct 23, 2002 10:52 pm
Location: Sydney, Australia
Contact:

Post by ray.wurlod »

Teradata EE is likely to give you the best performance (throughput) of all the Teradata stage types. Are you taking proper advantage of parallelism?
IBM Software Services Group
Any contribution to this forum is my own opinion and does not necessarily reflect any position that IBM may hold.
cwong
Charter Member
Charter Member
Posts: 26
Joined: Tue Apr 30, 2002 8:02 am
Location: Canada

Post by cwong »

Hi Ray,

Would you mind elaborating further a bit on the parallelism parameter settings ?
cwong
ghila
Premium Member
Premium Member
Posts: 41
Joined: Mon Mar 15, 2004 2:37 pm
Location: France

Post by ghila »

Hi,

When using TeraData Enterprise stage be sure to use "DBOptions". Like this :
user=myuser,password=*******,SessionsPerPlayer=2

you can add as well, the "RequestedSessions" option.

There is a relation between the "SessionsPerPlayer", the number of nodes and the resulting TeraData Sessions generated. In the above example ( SessionsPerPlayer=2) you will have 16 TeraData sessions for a 8 DataStage nodes.
In our environment ( a 20Tb TeraData database ) we try to limit up to 15 Teradata sessions for each application.
Try to balance performance and TeraData sessions by tuning the SessionsPerPlayer.

Hope this help.
Regards,

Daniel
ray.wurlod
Participant
Posts: 54607
Joined: Wed Oct 23, 2002 10:52 pm
Location: Sydney, Australia
Contact:

Post by ray.wurlod »

Great answer from Daniel - not much I can add to that. 8)
IBM Software Services Group
Any contribution to this forum is my own opinion and does not necessarily reflect any position that IBM may hold.
bcarlson
Premium Member
Premium Member
Posts: 772
Joined: Fri Oct 01, 2004 3:06 pm
Location: Minnesota

Post by bcarlson »

smuppidi wrote: Thanks Brad. Now i am using the Teradata EE, it works fine. But we are extracting about 10 million records and i am afraid about the performance using Teradata EE.
If you have any heavy volume extraction using Teradata EE version please share with me, that would greatly help.

Thanks,
Satish.
Satish, FastExport is the Teradata tool of choice when retrieving data - low or high volume, and that is the underlying tool used by the Teradata EE stage.

Brad.
smuppidi
Premium Member
Premium Member
Posts: 11
Joined: Fri Mar 17, 2006 9:00 am

Post by smuppidi »

Thanks all, great information. I could get that working fine using the Teradata EE.
Post Reply