CoSORT

Post questions here relative to DataStage Enterprise/PX Edition for such areas as Parallel job design, Parallel datasets, BuildOps, Wrappers, etc.

Moderators: chulett, rschirm, roy

Post Reply
jatayl
Premium Member
Premium Member
Posts: 47
Joined: Thu Jan 19, 2006 11:20 am
Location: Rogers, AR

CoSORT

Post by jatayl »

Anyone use CoSORT products in conjunction with DataStage Enterprise Edition?

Thanks,
Jason
kumar_s
Charter Member
Charter Member
Posts: 5245
Joined: Thu Jun 16, 2005 11:00 pm

Post by kumar_s »

Perhaps you may ask the issues or doubts you have, so that you may get the answer?
Impossible doesn't mean 'it is not possible' actually means... 'NOBODY HAS DONE IT SO FAR'
jatayl
Premium Member
Premium Member
Posts: 47
Joined: Thu Jan 19, 2006 11:20 am
Location: Rogers, AR

Post by jatayl »

kumar_s wrote:Perhaps you may ask the issues or doubts you have, so that you may get the answer?
Ok, my question is CoSORT says their product works with DataStage Server Edition, so I was wondering if anyone had used it with Enterprise Edition. I didn't know if it was possible.

Thanks.
ray.wurlod
Participant
Posts: 54607
Joined: Wed Oct 23, 2002 10:52 pm
Location: Sydney, Australia
Contact:

Post by ray.wurlod »

There is a CoSORT plug-in stage that gives access to CoSORT functionality.

"Plug-in", of course, simply means "optionally installed". In this case - due to licensing issues - it also means "separately chargeable".

I can not comment on its use, as I have not used it. However, if you visit the sister site of DSXchange, you can learn about the plug-in stage there.
IBM Software Services Group
Any contribution to this forum is my own opinion and does not necessarily reflect any position that IBM may hold.
vmcburney
Participant
Posts: 3593
Joined: Thu Jan 23, 2003 5:25 pm
Location: Australia, Melbourne
Contact:

Post by vmcburney »

So far CoSort have worked mainly with the server edition for developing the plugin and determining compatibility and measuring performance improvements. There is no doubt the CoSort sorting, filtering and aggregation is many times faster then a server job. As much as 100 times faster. What I am dubious about is whether it is an advantage to Enterprise Edition customers. If I had the time I would run benchmark comparisons.

Since they don't have a parallel plugin you would need to implement it as a server shared container in a parallel job or as an external job run from a Sequence job stage or routine. My investigation of DataStage server v enterprise: some performance stats indicates the parallel sort, aggregate and database stages are many times faster then the server edition equivelent. So the ROI of choosing CoSort is not as strong and the lack of a native parallel stage is a major drawback.

Probably worth evaluating if you have very large amounts of source data in text files. Enterprise Edition isn't great at sequential file sources, it needs to import the data and convert it into partioned data in the native format. If CoSort can read, sort, filter and aggregate this data before DataStage processes it you may save a lot of time.
Post Reply