HOW TO SHUTDOWN THIS WARNING

dsx_venkat · Post by **dsx_venkat** » Mon Sep 19, 2005 4:01 am

Hi All,

I am getting this warning whenever i am using reject link in the merge stage.

REJ020: When checking operator: A sequential operator cannot preserve the partitioning
of the parallel data set on input port 0.

Since i need the same partition in the output link, i cannot able to clear the partition, If i use a dataset instead of squential file, warning is not there, but i want to use the sequential file.

One solution i can think is handling this in the message handler., Is there is any other way to handle this.,

Regards.
venkat

roy · Post by **roy** » Mon Sep 19, 2005 5:23 am

Hi,
A partitioned sequential file would be interesting indeed if there was such a thing.
You get this since sequential files do not support partitioning, there for can't preserve them.
So you might be forced to use datasets after all Or simply run this job sequentially Or as you already know use message handlers.

It all depends on what you want/need.

IHTH,

richdhan · Post by **richdhan** » Mon Sep 19, 2005 8:39 am

Hi Venkat,

In the Stage prior to Sequential File Stage there is an option for propogating partition. Set it to CLEAR. The warning should disappear.

Venkat, Do a SEARCH in this forum before you post.

HTH
--Rich

dsx_venkat · Post by **dsx_venkat** » Mon Sep 19, 2005 9:32 am

Respected richdhan,

Please read my posting clearly,

Since i need the same partition in the output link, i cannot able to clear the partition, If i use a dataset instead of squential file, warning is not there, but i want to use the sequential file.

Before giving advice like "DO a search", please read the question properly.

Roy,

Thanks for your suggestion, actually i am using that stage alone as a sequential stage now.

kumar_s · Post by **kumar_s** » Mon Sep 19, 2005 10:37 am

Hi venkat,

The same topic has been discussed earliar.

viewtopic.php?t=95035&highlight=preserve+partiton

Rich was also a contibuting member on the previous post.

Since we dont have a face to face conversation in this forum, words can be interperted by various means. hence framing sentance is seems to be important.

Instead of creating a new thread, you could have appended the same thread...
regards
kumar

dsx_venkat · Post by **dsx_venkat** » Mon Sep 19, 2005 11:28 am

Kumar,

I tried to search, but couldnt get it,
As u said "framing sentance is seems to be important"

k,

richdhan, "sorry, if my word hurts u".

srikanthd1978 · Post by **srikanthd1978** » Tue Sep 20, 2005 8:38 am

..try using a copy operator prior to the seq file and clear the Partitioning on the Copy Op...this shld work..

thanks