DSXchange

Hi,

In my job sequence, there are many jobs. If any of the job fails or generats warning, I need to call an Abort job that updates one of the process status table as 'Failed' for the process.

The sequence has many job and from each we have added a custom condition (Abort or Warn) to the abort job.

To improve the readability of the job can we have back to back sequences?

E.g. Job1--->seq1--->seq2--->Seq3

Would it cause any prob? I tested it in some seq and was running fine. But just wanted to know if there is any well know prob in this.

No problem having sequences calling sequences, or having sequences running back to back within another sequence.

Keith, it is Sequencer stage in job sequences I am talking about.
I should have mentioned it clearly in the first place itself. Sorry for that.

That is a little different than what I was answering. What would be the purpose of having a sequencer stage back to back with another sequencer stage? If your job literally looks like:


job --> sequencer 1 --> sequencer 2 --> sequencer 3


What benefit are the sequencers providing?

That is a little different than what I was answering. What would be the purpose of having a sequencer stage back to back with another sequencer stage? If your job literally looks like:


job --> sequencer 1 --> sequencer 2 --> sequencer 3


What benefit are the sequencers providing?

job does not exactly looks like this.

I have many stages in my jobs some called parallelly and sequentially.

If I just put one sequecer then many links cross each other as well as go over stages. To make the job readable I was thinking adding more sequencer stages.

Do whatever you like as long as it works and you get the 'all' versus 'any' setting correct in the Sequencers.

Thanks Craig!