Page 1 of 1

Posted: Tue Mar 27, 2007 5:57 pm
by kduke
This is not uncommon to create an ODS as a buffer between your source and your data warehouse. I am sure Ken can give the long answer why this is important.

Posted: Tue Mar 27, 2007 8:56 pm
by DSguru2B
I agree with Kim. Not uncommon at all. I implemented something along those lines at one of my client's. Ken can definately throw some more light on it. We all love his in depth answers.

Posted: Tue Mar 27, 2007 9:51 pm
by ray.wurlod
A great start point is developing a business glossary - centralizing (and getting agreement upon) the definitions of business terminology. Only when you have this in place, and agreed to, does it make any sense to go forward with designing a centralized model.

I suggest that you look at IBM's business glossary offering, as it can be stored in the same location as metadata used by modelling tools, ETL design tools and metadata analytical tools, and can be leveraged by all of them.

Posted: Wed Mar 28, 2007 8:56 am
by RodBarnes
Thanks for the replies. Sounds like I am in the right direction. I look forward to Ken's input.

Ray: We are actually looking at the IBM Business Glossary and Metadata Workbench. Very impresive capability. The challenge (of course) is getting management and IBM to agree on a price. :wink:

Posted: Wed Mar 28, 2007 9:05 am
by DSguru2B
Is'nt that always the challenge :wink:
Good Luck.

Posted: Wed Mar 28, 2007 12:31 pm
by ray.wurlod
Wait for the challenge in getting all the silo owners to agree on consistent enterprise-wide terminology. How good are your negotiation and dispute resolution skills?!