Is there count without using aggregator
Moderators: chulett, rschirm, roy
-
ray.wurlod
- Participant
- Posts: 54607
- Joined: Wed Oct 23, 2002 10:52 pm
- Location: Sydney, Australia
- Contact:
-
AmeyJoshi14
- Participant
- Posts: 334
- Joined: Fri Dec 01, 2006 5:17 am
- Location: Texas
If you can easily achieve the results from the above stages then why you do not want to use any of the themrrsivaraghava wrote:is it possible without unix,aggregater and sort
can you please explain? 
http://findingjobsindatastage.blogspot.com/
Theory is when you know all and nothing works. Practice is when all works and nobody knows why. In this case we have put together theory and practice: nothing works. and nobody knows why! (Albert Einstein)
Theory is when you know all and nothing works. Practice is when all works and nobody knows why. In this case we have put together theory and practice: nothing works. and nobody knows why! (Albert Einstein)
Yes, reference and update a hashed file with newer values. Your data won't be required to be sorted, but you'll have to determine if the referencing/writing of the hashed file is more efficient than sorting and counting using stage variables or sorting and aggregating.
Kenneth Bland
Rank: Sempai
Belt: First degree black
Fight name: Captain Hook
Signature knockout: right upper cut followed by left hook
Signature submission: Crucifix combined with leg triangle
Rank: Sempai
Belt: First degree black
Fight name: Captain Hook
Signature knockout: right upper cut followed by left hook
Signature submission: Crucifix combined with leg triangle