Transfmer without an input link?

[georgesebastian]

Hi Everyone,

Will transfmor work with out an input link?
I know 1 way using stage variable and using constraint
Like @inrownum <1

Heard there are other ways can any one tell me?

[chulett]

No, there's no other way. You need a stage variable so the job will compile and a constraint so it doesn't generate an infinite number of rows.

[chulett]

He didn't tell you because there is no other answer. A least I've never heard of one. Trick question. Be happy to be proven wrong, however!

[DeepakCorning]

I agree ! U can have transformer without any input link but u will need to put a constraint in it and that you can do only through a stage variable and the reason is simple - there is no input :D

[rafik2k]

Good post!
I was also thinking to post the same.

Thanks georgesebastian

[DeepakCorning]

Same interview??

[ray.wurlod]

Observation: @INROWNUM < 1 will "work" - inasmuch as the job will compile and run without error, evaluating its stage variable(s) - but will not generate any rows.

The "other way" is probably to have a before-stage or after-stage subroutine.

[chulett]

Not generating any rows may be exactly what you want. I typically do that for either zero rows with an @FALSE constraint or for one row with @OUTROWNUM=1 constraint. The former might be used to clear a hashed file or truncate a table, for instance - the latter to trigger something 'special' in an OCI stage or for the STP stage.

Hadn't thought about the routine... a 'no op' routine perhaps? Its only purpose would be to appease the compiler, it would seem.

[baglasumit21]

Hi Everyone,

Will transfmor work with out an input link?
I know 1 way using stage variable and using constraint
Like @inrownum <1

Heard there are other ways can any one tell me?

@inrownum wont work as there is no input link and it wont generate the row. your constraint should be @outrownum<2