Handling of QQ for Mexican Addresses in Quality Stage

Infosphere's Quality Product

Moderators: chulett, rschirm

Post Reply
JRodriguez
Premium Member
Premium Member
Posts: 425
Joined: Sat Nov 19, 2005 9:26 am
Location: New York City
Contact:

Post by JRodriguez »

Are you using your entire pattern?

IP and UP overrides are specified only for an entire unhandled pattern, it doesn't work with partial pattern matching .... in your case I would used IP
Julio Rodriguez
ETL Developer by choice

"Sure we have lots of reasons for being rude - But no excuses
divstands
Participant
Posts: 128
Joined: Wed Jun 03, 2009 9:48 am

Post by divstands »

JRodriguez wrote:Are you using your entire pattern?

IP and UP overrides are specified only for an entire unhandled pattern, it doesn't work with partial pattern matching .... in your case I would used IP
Yeah, for the Unhandled Pattern, i am using the entire pattern,
but
for Input pattern, cant we give partial patterns?
I ask this because, for UP like

Q+
Q++
Q+++
Q++++
Q+++++

where we know that it is only Q+ which is causing the problem. But if we cannot use IP for a partial pattern, then we need to have a rule for each and every UP/IP like above!!

Can alternate way be to modify the pattern action file instead for handling of Q+ here?
JRodriguez
Premium Member
Premium Member
Posts: 425
Joined: Sat Nov 19, 2005 9:26 am
Location: New York City
Contact:

Post by JRodriguez »

Yes, Always you can make your own version of the rule set... taking the original as a base where you can add all patterns and actions that allow to process your data ...
Julio Rodriguez
ETL Developer by choice

"Sure we have lots of reasons for being rude - But no excuses
Post Reply