Yes The SID ,USER and PWD are defined well.We are able to import metadata using these credentials,but it gives trouble while View-Data as well as Insert/Update.kumar_s wrote:Are the environmental varialbe SID and USER been defiend in the new environment?
Search found 46 matches
- Tue Apr 25, 2006 12:33 am
- Forum: IBM<sup>®</sup> DataStage Enterprise Edition (Formerly Parallel Extender/PX)
- Topic: connect failed --Oracle error: -2127
- Replies: 9
- Views: 6278
- Mon Apr 24, 2006 11:20 pm
- Forum: IBM<sup>®</sup> DataStage Enterprise Edition (Formerly Parallel Extender/PX)
- Topic: connect failed --Oracle error: -2127
- Replies: 9
- Views: 6278
connect failed --Oracle error: -2127
I've exporeted a job from my development environment to production.The job which used to run fine in DEV is throwing some error in the production. The job design is as follows Ora_TAB1------>TRANSFORMER------>FlatFile The necessary priveleges are given to the datastage user in Oracle. The error says...
- Fri Mar 10, 2006 1:16 am
- Forum: IBM<sup>®</sup> DataStage Enterprise Edition (Formerly Parallel Extender/PX)
- Topic: Sap ABAP pack terminates abnormally
- Replies: 0
- Views: 1066
Sap ABAP pack terminates abnormally
I'm extracting data from sap R/3 using the plugin ABAP pack.But I'm facing an issue while running the jobs,i.e:either the job hangs for too long or gets aborted very soon saying 'APT_CombinedOperatorController,0: Logging delayed metadata.' APT_CombinedOperatorController,0: Requesting delayed metadat...
- Fri Dec 16, 2005 3:11 am
- Forum: IBM<sup>®</sup> DataStage Enterprise Edition (Formerly Parallel Extender/PX)
- Topic: received signal SIGSEGV
- Replies: 5
- Views: 3073
Re: received signal SIGSEGV
APT_CombinedOperatorController,0: Operator terminated abnormally: received signal SIGSEGV main_program: Unexpected termination by Unix signal 9(SIGKILL) When i executed the job with a lesser configuration it works fine for the remaining 4 times. I want to know whether this error is caused by Bad jo...
- Wed Dec 14, 2005 11:39 pm
- Forum: IBM<sup>®</sup> DataStage Enterprise Edition (Formerly Parallel Extender/PX)
- Topic: Parallel Extender TransformerStage Issue
- Replies: 10
- Views: 2329
There's no single step resolution for these issues.what u can probably try next is to make copies of ur existing job so that it has less no. of derivations,say 300 cols * 4 jobs (=1220 cols),so that all the columns are there.If all of these compiles individually,we can suspect other issues,and if it...
- Wed Dec 14, 2005 6:06 am
- Forum: IBM<sup>®</sup> DataStage Enterprise Edition (Formerly Parallel Extender/PX)
- Topic: Parallel Extender TransformerStage Issue
- Replies: 10
- Views: 2329
- Wed Dec 14, 2005 5:51 am
- Forum: IBM<sup>®</sup> DataStage Enterprise Edition (Formerly Parallel Extender/PX)
- Topic: Parallel Extender TransformerStage Issue
- Replies: 10
- Views: 2329
I dont think datastage by itself changes the type of data,apart from considering a decimal without precision as integer on the fly. pls check whether any of the derivations have syntax prob(red mark),like any braces not closed or so. Minor mistakes like that can happen as the no. of fields are more...
- Wed Dec 14, 2005 5:34 am
- Forum: IBM<sup>®</sup> DataStage Enterprise Edition (Formerly Parallel Extender/PX)
- Topic: Sort Stage: Processing the data differnetly
- Replies: 3
- Views: 1157
Re: Sort Stage: Processing the data differnetly
Hi, I have a doubt I am processing 10,000 records using seq--->sort--->seq. I got the log as Sort_1,0: Sort revision : 2.6.2 Total CPU (sec) : 0.188 user (sec) : 0.141 system (sec) : 0.047 Records processed: 10000 Bytes processed : 1360K Disk space used : 0 Next time I processed 1 million records i...
- Wed Dec 14, 2005 5:27 am
- Forum: IBM<sup>®</sup> DataStage Enterprise Edition (Formerly Parallel Extender/PX)
- Topic: Parallel Extender TransformerStage Issue
- Replies: 10
- Views: 2329
I dont think datastage by itself changes the type of data,apart from considering a decimal without precision as integer on the fly.
pls check whether any of the derivations have syntax prob(red mark),like any braces not closed or so.
Minor mistakes like that can happen as the no. of fields are more..
pls check whether any of the derivations have syntax prob(red mark),like any braces not closed or so.
Minor mistakes like that can happen as the no. of fields are more..
- Wed Dec 14, 2005 4:51 am
- Forum: IBM<sup>®</sup> DataStage Enterprise Edition (Formerly Parallel Extender/PX)
- Topic: Parallel Extender TransformerStage Issue
- Replies: 10
- Views: 2329
- Wed Dec 14, 2005 4:31 am
- Forum: IBM<sup>®</sup> DataStage Enterprise Edition (Formerly Parallel Extender/PX)
- Topic: Parallel Extender TransformerStage Issue
- Replies: 10
- Views: 2329
Re: Parallel Extender TransformerStage Issue
Its not clear whether u have tested the whole derivations in chunks of 300 or only some of it to conclude that - The derivetions used are same through out every column. which functions might have thrown the error. Can u pls paste the full output from the transformer compiler error log.. That may hel...
- Tue Dec 13, 2005 1:07 am
- Forum: IBM<sup>®</sup> DataStage Enterprise Edition (Formerly Parallel Extender/PX)
- Topic: Comparision betn Oracle Eprise Stage and Bulk Load Stage
- Replies: 4
- Views: 1491
Thanks Kenneth for the reply. In the Oracle Enterprise Stage, i use UPSERT option with User-Defined Update and Insert. The updates which iam doing are fictitious updates which will never work as they have Where Clause 1=2. Instead of using fictitious updates ,you can set the property to user_define...
- Mon Dec 12, 2005 11:29 pm
- Forum: IBM<sup>®</sup> DataStage Enterprise Edition (Formerly Parallel Extender/PX)
- Topic: Error in Parallel Routine
- Replies: 4
- Views: 2064
Re: Error in Parallel Routine
##I TFCP 000008 12:08:30(012) <transform> Error when checking composite operator: cxx -W/TP -W/EHa -DAPT_USE_ANSI_IOSTREAMS -c -O -IC:/Ascential/DataStage/PXEngine/include C:/Ascential/DataStage/Projects/P1/RT_BP1.O/V0S1_First_Transformer_1.C -o C:/Ascential/DataStage/Projects/P1/RT_BP1.O/V0S1_Firs...
- Mon Dec 12, 2005 11:19 pm
- Forum: IBM<sup>®</sup> DataStage Enterprise Edition (Formerly Parallel Extender/PX)
- Topic: Argument Not Optional --- Director closes after this error
- Replies: 6
- Views: 1343
- Mon Dec 12, 2005 5:58 am
- Forum: IBM<sup>®</sup> DataStage Enterprise Edition (Formerly Parallel Extender/PX)
- Topic: How to capture reject rows
- Replies: 3
- Views: 1246
Re: How to capture reject rows
Is it feasible to use a Merge stage instead of join so that you'll have reject links corresponding to each update dataset you use?