Hi,
I am updating a table from a file
Today its taking more time than last night
The only difference is last night the file was fixed-width format and today it is pipe-delimited format
Any insight will be helpful
Thanks
Kishan
Search found 70 matches
- Mon Feb 06, 2006 6:49 pm
- Forum: IBM<sup>®</sup> DataStage Enterprise Edition (Formerly Parallel Extender/PX)
- Topic: Performance difference between fixed-width / Delimited file
- Replies: 10
- Views: 7652
- Mon Feb 06, 2006 6:08 pm
- Forum: IBM<sup>®</sup> Infosphere DataStage Server Edition
- Topic: ORA-02291
- Replies: 7
- Views: 3735
Are you trying to insert or delete? Anyways its a database error The ones who have replied before have given you what might be the cause. But you have not explained clearly. Just giving the error is not enough You can get info if you do a google search If you are deleting a record that is linked to ...
- Wed Feb 01, 2006 7:53 pm
- Forum: IBM<sup>®</sup> Infosphere DataStage Server Edition
- Topic: Does the link collector option improve performance?
- Replies: 6
- Views: 1790
Thanks a lot I did this in two steps First selecting from the table and writing to a Seq file Second Seq File to Update the table This has really improved the performance But I have been questioned by my boss that how does a direct update take more time than writing to a file and updating. I am not ...
- Wed Feb 01, 2006 4:55 pm
- Forum: IBM<sup>®</sup> Infosphere DataStage Server Edition
- Topic: Does the link collector option improve performance?
- Replies: 6
- Views: 1790
- Wed Feb 01, 2006 4:09 pm
- Forum: IBM<sup>®</sup> Infosphere DataStage Server Edition
- Topic: Does the link collector option improve performance?
- Replies: 6
- Views: 1790
Am not able to read the rest of the message I dono when my chartered account will be created I did a ps-ef|grep jobname ps -ef|grep jobname ak77 106358 379828 0 11:31:01 - 0:03 phantom DSD.StageRun jobname. jobname.Transformer_106 2 0/5 0 ak77 198758 1088320 0 11:31:01 - 0:04 phantom DSD.StageRun jo...
- Wed Feb 01, 2006 3:21 pm
- Forum: IBM<sup>®</sup> Infosphere DataStage Server Edition
- Topic: Does the link collector option improve performance?
- Replies: 6
- Views: 1790
Does the link collector option improve performance?
Hi everybody, Guess its a better idea to become a charter member as most of the replies doesn't make sense without that. I am reading from a join of two tables. This data is looked up against another hash table. Am using a Link partioner and Link Collector. Finally am updating to a table. Does the l...
- Tue Jan 24, 2006 7:06 pm
- Forum: IBM<sup>®</sup> Infosphere DataStage Server Edition
- Topic: Wierd Problem with Shared Container
- Replies: 6
- Views: 2223
- Fri Jan 20, 2006 3:17 pm
- Forum: IBM<sup>®</sup> Infosphere DataStage Server Edition
- Topic: Wierd Problem with Shared Container
- Replies: 6
- Views: 2223
Ray - I see what you mean but I was using a LinkCollector to write to a single file and also four different sequential files It does the same meaning it wont show any information on one of the links I am not sure why its happening Initially I had this problem in 6.0.1 and another friend of mine told...
- Wed Jan 18, 2006 12:22 pm
- Forum: IBM<sup>®</sup> Infosphere DataStage Server Edition
- Topic: Wierd Problem with Shared Container
- Replies: 6
- Views: 2223
Wierd Problem with Shared Container
Hi everybody, I created a shared container and am using it in a different job This job has four of this shared containers and they are all writing to one sequential file. The performance characteristics( meaning the Show Performance in the Designer) is not displayed in one of the links but the monit...
- Thu Dec 22, 2005 1:41 am
- Forum: IBM<sup>®</sup> Infosphere DataStage Server Edition
- Topic: PRINTER memory segment error
- Replies: 4
- Views: 2587
- Thu Dec 22, 2005 12:43 am
- Forum: IBM<sup>®</sup> Infosphere DataStage Server Edition
- Topic: Job is been accessed by another user
- Replies: 9
- Views: 3718
- Thu Dec 22, 2005 12:24 am
- Forum: IBM<sup>®</sup> Infosphere DataStage Server Edition
- Topic: PRINTER memory segment error
- Replies: 4
- Views: 2587
Ray - When a process is finished, and another process starts soon afterwards and is allocated the same DataStage user number, the printer shared memory segment from the previous process has to be removed as part of the login procedure for the new process. The message informs you that this has occurr...
- Wed Dec 21, 2005 11:41 pm
- Forum: IBM<sup>®</sup> Infosphere DataStage Server Edition
- Topic: Updating Oracle table with a date lookup
- Replies: 4
- Views: 2893
Thanks Am sorry about all the confusion I just left DataStage handle everything I am selecting this date field and just using this as a condition for update Yes, Timestamp helped and DataStage did all the TO_CHAR and TO_DATE and it was a simple thing which I complicated by using all the conversion a...
- Wed Dec 21, 2005 6:26 pm
- Forum: IBM<sup>®</sup> Infosphere DataStage Server Edition
- Topic: Updating Oracle table with a date lookup
- Replies: 4
- Views: 2893
Updating Oracle table with a date lookup
Hi I am updating an ORACLE 8i table with where date = date Incoming date field is selected in the format TO_CHAR(DATEfield,'YYYY-MM-DD HH24:MI:SS') Then I am using ICONV/OCONV Combo to get this date format in a stage variable Oconv(Iconv(Left(Link1.DATEfield,10), "D-YMD"), "D-DMY[2,A3...
- Tue Dec 20, 2005 6:33 pm
- Forum: IBM<sup>®</sup> Infosphere DataStage Server Edition
- Topic: ORA-01555 error
- Replies: 11
- Views: 7330
Thanks everybody, That is what I thought and since i started this, i am going to let it finish But when i actually turn it over to the other side, i am going to serialize the two jobs Already it seems like the job s going to take like 10+ hrs to finish, another 3 hrs would not matter i guess This wi...