Search found 124 matches
- Mon Jul 14, 2008 11:40 am
- Forum: IBM<sup>®</sup> DataStage Enterprise Edition (Formerly Parallel Extender/PX)
- Topic: Installation of DataStage 7.5.2 on RedHat Linux 4.0
- Replies: 4
- Views: 1895
Don't count on the installation guide too much, though you should read through the Guide before you proceed since you don't want to get into situation stated by Arnold... There are a couple tricks on installing 7.5.2 in RH Linux 4, where the installation guide doesn't touch too much. Post your messa...
- Wed Jul 09, 2008 10:08 am
- Forum: IBM<sup>®</sup> DataStage Enterprise Edition (Formerly Parallel Extender/PX)
- Topic: error while compiling the job
- Replies: 15
- Views: 10670
This compiler error is nothing to do with your PX Routine based on the error message you posted. Your Transformer Stage is possibly corrupted by RCP option in Output link. Try the followings: 1. Remove the Transformer Stage, Drag a new one to designer, and remap all the Output link columns. 2. Ensur...
- Wed Jul 02, 2008 1:32 pm
- Forum: IBM<sup>®</sup> DataStage Enterprise Edition (Formerly Parallel Extender/PX)
- Topic: Warning when using environment variable in transformer stage
- Replies: 5
- Views: 2568
- Wed Jun 04, 2008 1:52 pm
- Forum: IBM<sup>®</sup> DataStage Enterprise Edition (Formerly Parallel Extender/PX)
- Topic: Basic Routine in dataStage PX
- Replies: 17
- Views: 7023
- Thu May 08, 2008 1:30 pm
- Forum: IBM<sup>®</sup> DataStage Enterprise Edition (Formerly Parallel Extender/PX)
- Topic: COnver Server routine to parallel
- Replies: 7
- Views: 2180
To convert your basic routine to C routine is doable. The first two lines are ok via using strcat and system in C, but you may have to dig into the include files in .../DSEngine/include or .../PXEngine/include to find out if those functions such as trim, Ereplace/Convert, Field are declared, and sea...
- Thu May 08, 2008 10:28 am
- Forum: IBM<sup>®</sup> DataStage Enterprise Edition (Formerly Parallel Extender/PX)
- Topic: Never use basic transformers!!!
- Replies: 22
- Views: 9566
- Thu May 08, 2008 10:18 am
- Forum: IBM<sup>®</sup> DataStage Enterprise Edition (Formerly Parallel Extender/PX)
- Topic: Never use basic transformers!!!
- Replies: 22
- Views: 9566
- Thu May 08, 2008 9:11 am
- Forum: IBM<sup>®</sup> DataStage Enterprise Edition (Formerly Parallel Extender/PX)
- Topic: Never use basic transformers!!!
- Replies: 22
- Views: 9566
MPP is for sure not in the case I described in my previous post. My clients has already paid the premium price upfront upon purchasing the product, so the license issues never come across to their attention. It's good to know the limitation for helping out the new clients in the future, Thanks for t...
- Wed May 07, 2008 3:22 pm
- Forum: IBM<sup>®</sup> DataStage Enterprise Edition (Formerly Parallel Extender/PX)
- Topic: Never use basic transformers!!!
- Replies: 22
- Views: 9566
I'd like to defend on the method using Basic Transformer in PX job via following observations: 1. Place Basic Transformer in a PX job won't break Partitioned Parallelism inscribed by PX engine, since it can be run in Parallel to map with Partitioned method declared in its Predecessor stage and its S...
- Wed May 07, 2008 2:46 pm
- Forum: IBM<sup>®</sup> DataStage Enterprise Edition (Formerly Parallel Extender/PX)
- Topic: Use Basic Transformer in PX job
- Replies: 8
- Views: 2611
- Mon May 05, 2008 10:31 pm
- Forum: IBM<sup>®</sup> DataStage Enterprise Edition (Formerly Parallel Extender/PX)
- Topic: Use Basic Transformer in PX job
- Replies: 8
- Views: 2611
Ray, I tried to save the job as a new one, and replace the Basic Transformer with a regular PX transformer and the job finished no error. I have also created a new job from scratch using PX tranformer and the job finished no error also. Any other hint? BTW, I tried to change UVTEMP to the other driv...
- Mon May 05, 2008 4:01 pm
- Forum: IBM<sup>®</sup> DataStage Enterprise Edition (Formerly Parallel Extender/PX)
- Topic: Use Basic Transformer in PX job
- Replies: 8
- Views: 2611
Ray, I have reboot the Windows XP several time to ensure there is no system resource issue before I rerun this job. However, the problem is consistenly occuring no matter what I tired to run. To my understandings, there is only one version 7.5x2 in Windows and I don't have any patch related to this ...
- Sun May 04, 2008 6:28 am
- Forum: IBM<sup>®</sup> DataStage Enterprise Edition (Formerly Parallel Extender/PX)
- Topic: Use Basic Transformer in PX job
- Replies: 8
- Views: 2611
Ray, thanks for reply. I am executing the PX job in a single PX machine(Server/Client installed), and I have ensured UVTEMP point to C:\TEMP and C:\TEMP is empty and C: got plenty of space, but the problem persists. The same patch level of DataStage server/client installed in Windows 2000 server D: ...
- Sat May 03, 2008 3:45 pm
- Forum: IBM<sup>®</sup> DataStage Enterprise Edition (Formerly Parallel Extender/PX)
- Topic: Use Basic Transformer in PX job
- Replies: 8
- Views: 2611
Use Basic Transformer in PX job
Hi All,
Has anyone encountered the following problem:
ds_ipcopen() - call to OpenMutex() failed - The system cannot find the file specified.
When using Basic Transformer in a PX job.
I have no problem in Windows 2000 server, the problem is in XP.
Please help!
Has anyone encountered the following problem:
ds_ipcopen() - call to OpenMutex() failed - The system cannot find the file specified.
When using Basic Transformer in a PX job.
I have no problem in Windows 2000 server, the problem is in XP.
Please help!
- Thu Dec 06, 2007 11:20 am
- Forum: IBM<sup>®</sup> DataStage Enterprise Edition (Formerly Parallel Extender/PX)
- Topic: UNIX just resetting the job
- Replies: 4
- Views: 2557