Search found 46 matches
- Tue Oct 03, 2006 12:57 am
- Forum: IBM<sup>®</sup> Infosphere DataStage Server Edition
- Topic: Get Link Direction within Job via Routine
- Replies: 8
- Views: 1969
- Tue Sep 26, 2006 1:13 am
- Forum: IBM<sup>®</sup> Infosphere DataStage Server Edition
- Topic: Get Link Direction within Job via Routine
- Replies: 8
- Views: 1969
Get Link Direction within Job via Routine
Hi, I am aware that one can get Link Names attached with the stage. However, how does one get Link Direction. Seq_1 --> Trfm(Transformer) --> Seq_2 If one wants to know that transformer has only one o/p link to Seq_2 and one i/p link from Seq_1. How does one find the direction of the link name. I ca...
- Wed Sep 13, 2006 5:32 am
- Forum: IBM<sup>®</sup> DataStage Enterprise Edition (Formerly Parallel Extender/PX)
- Topic: Dataset Read Performance
- Replies: 4
- Views: 1597
- Thu Sep 07, 2006 7:52 am
- Forum: IBM<sup>®</sup> DataStage Enterprise Edition (Formerly Parallel Extender/PX)
- Topic: Dataset Read Performance
- Replies: 4
- Views: 1597
Will be careful in analysing metrics. Thanks. The Revised design is : Dataset(30 million) --> Lkp1 (363)--> Lkp2(392)-->Lkp3(991343)--> Lkp4(35116) --> Datasets I understand that in Lookup3 , could have been a join condition, however with the input stream being a bit more, getting them sorted and pa...
- Thu Sep 07, 2006 7:01 am
- Forum: IBM<sup>®</sup> DataStage Enterprise Edition (Formerly Parallel Extender/PX)
- Topic: Dataset Read Performance
- Replies: 4
- Views: 1597
Dataset Read Performance
Hi, We have a simple job design. (30 Million ) Dataset -----> Small Lkp(393) -----> Small Lkp (392) --> Datasets. The dataset is not sorted. More than half of my cpu's are idle for more than 55%(using 'topas'). However, the throughput of reading this dataset is no more than 8000 rows/sec. Am i missi...
- Sun Sep 03, 2006 11:25 am
- Forum: IBM<sup>®</sup> DataStage Enterprise Edition (Formerly Parallel Extender/PX)
- Topic: lookup step:not enough step
- Replies: 8
- Views: 4107
- Sun Sep 03, 2006 10:49 am
- Forum: IBM<sup>®</sup> DataStage Enterprise Edition (Formerly Parallel Extender/PX)
- Topic: lookup step:not enough step
- Replies: 8
- Views: 4107
Hi, I checked the Scratch disk space and also pointed my TMPDIR to the same scratch disk space. While executing the jobs, i monitored the usage of this disk, GB of free space continued to remain available. However, while running 'topas', out of the 16 cpu's only 4 cpu's were getting very heavily use...
- Sun Sep 03, 2006 8:05 am
- Forum: IBM<sup>®</sup> DataStage Enterprise Edition (Formerly Parallel Extender/PX)
- Topic: lookup step:not enough step
- Replies: 8
- Views: 4107
Hi, The OS indeed being AIX. The Url currently points to non-existing page.However, i have checked the partition's Dataset directory, which has sufficient space. The volumes here are just around 0.3 million in lookups and 30 million as input stream. We have 490 MB in /tmp. Would it be possible to li...
- Thu Aug 24, 2006 9:00 am
- Forum: IBM<sup>®</sup> DataStage Enterprise Edition (Formerly Parallel Extender/PX)
- Topic: Strange Problem - Join Performance Inconsistencies
- Replies: 9
- Views: 4687
- Wed Aug 23, 2006 11:45 pm
- Forum: IBM<sup>®</sup> DataStage Enterprise Edition (Formerly Parallel Extender/PX)
- Topic: Strange Problem - Join Performance Inconsistencies
- Replies: 9
- Views: 4687
Thank you all for pointers. Will try and will post on this thread my findings. Hi what turn RCP on will do in this case. Thanks Sanjay Hi, You are joining 2 sequential files with huge data. As DataSatge is reading from sequential files, this is anyway serial. In this case the conversion is Sequentia...
- Wed Aug 23, 2006 9:50 am
- Forum: IBM<sup>®</sup> DataStage Enterprise Edition (Formerly Parallel Extender/PX)
- Topic: Strange Problem - Join Performance Inconsistencies
- Replies: 9
- Views: 4687
Strange Problem - Join Performance Inconsistencies
Hi, I have a simple job flow design/ Seq File(47 Mill Rec) is getting joined with Another Seq File.(20 Mill ).After doing join, there are some transformation and my target file is dataset file. Since we are dealing with huge volumes, we have sort stage using Hash partition on join keys in both the s...
- Wed Aug 23, 2006 9:47 am
- Forum: IBM<sup>®</sup> DataStage Enterprise Edition (Formerly Parallel Extender/PX)
- Topic: Wrapper - Difference in execution ( Sequential v/s Parallel
- Replies: 7
- Views: 3035
Hi, Yes i am having a collector on the Seq Stage. I am not able to find the error message, maybe i am missing something here. The log is hereby inline attached. For the actual filename of my job, i have replaced '<<ACTUAL_FILE_NAME>>' in the log. This particular file had 1000 records and i had to ki...
- Mon Aug 21, 2006 10:43 pm
- Forum: IBM<sup>®</sup> DataStage Enterprise Edition (Formerly Parallel Extender/PX)
- Topic: Wrapper - Difference in execution ( Sequential v/s Parallel
- Replies: 7
- Views: 3035
Yes,That is the most confusing. Without any changes to the job, it works in parallel mode. However, it fails on processing some random file in sequential mode. Job Design From sequential files i read 4 records( since delimiter check) For header i use a head stage and i check in transformer depending...
- Mon Aug 21, 2006 3:30 am
- Forum: IBM<sup>®</sup> DataStage Enterprise Edition (Formerly Parallel Extender/PX)
- Topic: Wrapper - Difference in execution ( Sequential v/s Parallel
- Replies: 7
- Views: 3035
- Mon Aug 21, 2006 2:24 am
- Forum: IBM<sup>®</sup> DataStage Enterprise Edition (Formerly Parallel Extender/PX)
- Topic: Wrapper - Difference in execution ( Sequential v/s Parallel
- Replies: 7
- Views: 3035
Wrapper - Difference in execution ( Sequential v/s Parallel
Hi, OS: AIX PX :7.5.1 Config file:-8 nodes I have a job which does the following:- a) Extraction of Header Record b) Extraction of Tail Record c) Row Count d) Delimiter Sanity Check e) FileName Check To do this, i have couple of wrappers and a transform in a job. (Multiple instance is not checked). ...