Search found 296 matches
- Tue Feb 03, 2009 6:36 am
- Forum: IBM<sup>®</sup> DataStage Enterprise Edition (Formerly Parallel Extender/PX)
- Topic: problem with special characters while reading from AS400
- Replies: 3
- Views: 1908
Craig must be on vacation. What is athe ASCII value of the special characters you want to reject? Find that out and only write records that don't contain them. Write those that do to the reject link. '?' just means the character is unprintable. You need to replace the '?' with the ASCII value (CHAR(...
- Fri Jan 30, 2009 7:40 am
- Forum: General
- Topic: Need to mail attached file only when data is present
- Replies: 2
- Views: 1064
- Fri Jan 30, 2009 6:16 am
- Forum: IBM<sup>®</sup> Infosphere DataStage Server Edition
- Topic: Array Size in OCI Stage, Performance Tuning
- Replies: 2
- Views: 4749
You've got a single job with 25 OCI stages all retrieving data? Hunh. RE#4. Arraysize. I did something really strange, I looked it up! Too high and you'll blow the buffer and the job will fail. This is dependent on the number of columns and their datatype sizes. Putting aside your fundamental questi...
- Fri Jan 30, 2009 5:25 am
- Forum: General
- Topic: How can I log Errors / Exceptions to a file?
- Replies: 8
- Views: 2598
Example;
Code: Select all
vJOB_STATUS = DSTranslateCode(DSGetJobInfo(DSJ.ME, DSJ.JOBINTERIMSTATUS))
* The interim status of the just completed job itself
IF vJOB_STATUS = "Finished OK"
- Thu Jan 29, 2009 3:50 pm
- Forum: IBM<sup>®</sup> DataStage Enterprise Edition (Formerly Parallel Extender/PX)
- Topic: Transformer constraints with multiple values?
- Replies: 11
- Views: 7420
I've used it for two digit codes. The trick was inserting a character that wouldn't appear in the field like this; INDEX('12|23|45|XY',LINK.FIELD,1). You'll get a non-zero return for 12, 23, 45, and XY codes. You can go bigger I'm sure, you just have to make sure that a field doesn't show up as a su...
- Thu Jan 29, 2009 2:51 pm
- Forum: IBM<sup>®</sup> DataStage Enterprise Edition (Formerly Parallel Extender/PX)
- Topic: Transformer constraints with multiple values?
- Replies: 11
- Views: 7420
- Thu Jan 29, 2009 2:28 pm
- Forum: IBM<sup>®</sup> DataStage Enterprise Edition (Formerly Parallel Extender/PX)
- Topic: Transformer constraints with multiple values?
- Replies: 11
- Views: 7420
- Thu Jan 29, 2009 2:22 pm
- Forum: IBM<sup>®</sup> DataStage Enterprise Edition (Formerly Parallel Extender/PX)
- Topic: Transformer constraints with multiple values?
- Replies: 11
- Views: 7420
- Thu Jan 29, 2009 11:34 am
- Forum: IBM<sup>®</sup> DataStage Enterprise Edition (Formerly Parallel Extender/PX)
- Topic: Transformer constraints with multiple values?
- Replies: 11
- Views: 7420
- Tue Jan 27, 2009 11:57 am
- Forum: IBM<sup>®</sup> DataStage Enterprise Edition (Formerly Parallel Extender/PX)
- Topic: runtime column propagation on Oracle enterprise output
- Replies: 2
- Views: 1252
- Sun Jan 25, 2009 4:13 pm
- Forum: IBM<sup>®</sup> DataStage Enterprise Edition (Formerly Parallel Extender/PX)
- Topic: Setting a Teradata primary index for a write replace stage
- Replies: 11
- Views: 5741
- Sun Jan 25, 2009 1:08 pm
- Forum: IBM<sup>®</sup> DataStage Enterprise Edition (Formerly Parallel Extender/PX)
- Topic: Setting a Teradata primary index for a write replace stage
- Replies: 11
- Views: 5741
- Fri Jan 23, 2009 2:17 pm
- Forum: IBM<sup>®</sup> DataStage Enterprise Edition (Formerly Parallel Extender/PX)
- Topic: warning on insert decimal with oracle stage load append mode
- Replies: 4
- Views: 3063
An Oracle NUMBER without precision or scale (A floating point number) is interpreted by Datastage as DECIMAL(38,10). Also any function call resulting in a numeric result. One CANNOT change this from the column grid as any metadata you define in the job will be overridden when the stage executes. Dat...
- Fri Jan 23, 2009 1:28 pm
- Forum: General
- Topic: Datastage market condition
- Replies: 7
- Views: 3538
- Fri Jan 23, 2009 7:38 am
- Forum: IBM<sup>®</sup> DataStage Enterprise Edition (Formerly Parallel Extender/PX)
- Topic: 'Parallel job reports failure (code 139)
- Replies: 6
- Views: 4335