Search found 459 matches
- Fri Nov 12, 2004 7:56 am
- Forum: IBM<sup>®</sup> Infosphere DataStage Server Edition
- Topic: Windows XP SP2 and DataStage
- Replies: 9
- Views: 5126
- Fri Nov 12, 2004 7:52 am
- Forum: IBM<sup>®</sup> DataStage Enterprise Edition (Formerly Parallel Extender/PX)
- Topic: Error in preserve partitioning when Joiner Stage Used
- Replies: 3
- Views: 2131
Do not worry about this warning message if this solution is producing the right data for you. Normally, the Join Stage already handle the sort/partitioning for you, but in your observed case, it does not do the job. Maybe the datasets are sorted/partitioned earlier (and this noted behavior do propag...
- Fri Nov 12, 2004 7:48 am
- Forum: IBM<sup>®</sup> Infosphere DataStage Server Edition
- Topic: Splitting Concatenated Strings
- Replies: 4
- Views: 2453
- Fri Nov 12, 2004 7:48 am
- Forum: IBM<sup>®</sup> DataStage Enterprise Edition (Formerly Parallel Extender/PX)
- Topic: Stupid Beginners Ques re lookup stage - HELP I am to dense
- Replies: 3
- Views: 2025
Just make sure it is standard practice for everything -- do not partition/sort data unless you have to. And when you think you have to do it, run a nice small test with a bunch of randomized data to confirm that this is indeed required. Ascential tries to minimize the need to do manual control over ...
- Thu Nov 11, 2004 10:39 pm
- Forum: IBM<sup>®</sup> Infosphere DataStage Server Edition
- Topic: Oracle 8i and 9i clients on same DS sever?
- Replies: 10
- Views: 3512
- Thu Nov 11, 2004 8:02 pm
- Forum: IBM<sup>®</sup> DataStage Enterprise Edition (Formerly Parallel Extender/PX)
- Topic: SQL0911
- Replies: 13
- Views: 7346
I am aware and empathize with you for having someone from Ascential who did not meet up with my personal standard of quality development skills. Please repeat what I stated to the client: There are no perfect solution. Do you want to spend hours, which equals to a large amount of money out of your b...
- Thu Nov 11, 2004 7:36 pm
- Forum: IBM<sup>®</sup> DataStage Enterprise Edition (Formerly Parallel Extender/PX)
- Topic: SQL0911
- Replies: 13
- Views: 7346
This is a situation where DataStage is being asked to do something that it is really not designed to do. Do you REALLY want to just copy a table to another table? Then why not do it within EE's framework: [UDB] -> [copy] -> [UDB] This is a case of 'why try to fix a complicated solution that does not...
- Thu Nov 11, 2004 7:00 pm
- Forum: IBM<sup>®</sup> DataStage Enterprise Edition (Formerly Parallel Extender/PX)
- Topic: Sequential file validation question
- Replies: 4
- Views: 3486
Quick and dirty method - Do it in two jobs: 1. First job - Place key fields from Item Header Record to every record immediately afterward. You will need to run this transformer in sequential mode to prevent any partitioning. You can use the Stage Variables to handle the awareness of the header recor...
- Thu Nov 11, 2004 6:55 pm
- Forum: IBM<sup>®</sup> DataStage Enterprise Edition (Formerly Parallel Extender/PX)
- Topic: Stupid Beginners Ques re lookup stage - HELP I am to dense
- Replies: 3
- Views: 2025
Re: Stupid Beginners Ques re lookup stage - HELP I am to den
PX job 1 load CustLookup into lookup dataset modulas partioned on custid PX job 2 read CUstDate -->> tfm with partion mod on cust id Please do not use manual partitioning. Lookup stage is designed to handle partitioning on its own (in fact, by default they use "Entire" partitioning). If y...