Search found 430 matches
- Wed Oct 25, 2006 11:35 pm
- Forum: IBM<sup>®</sup> Infosphere DataStage Server Edition
- Topic: Problem related to job abort and exit
- Replies: 8
- Views: 2411
Das, Resetting depdends on the way you are calling the job for these 10 files. How are you calling this job for 10 files? If you are calling through a job sequence, then for that job activity just set the run mode to Reset if required, and run . There are many options available for resetting like us...
- Wed Oct 25, 2006 11:26 pm
- Forum: IBM<sup>®</sup> Infosphere DataStage Server Edition
- Topic: Row out of sequence error
- Replies: 12
- Views: 3424
In your query, if you add order by clause before the union operator then I think it will change the order of output. In DB2 at least it works like this. So a query (select * from emp where DeptNo=10 order by empno) UNION (select * from emp where DeptNo=20 order by empno) , will not give the output i...
- Wed Oct 25, 2006 11:16 pm
- Forum: IBM<sup>®</sup> Infosphere DataStage Server Edition
- Topic: DSDB2 cannot change the demical data type to date format
- Replies: 5
- Views: 2367
- Tue Oct 24, 2006 12:30 am
- Forum: IBM<sup>®</sup> DataStage Enterprise Edition (Formerly Parallel Extender/PX)
- Topic: Disk space for a job
- Replies: 3
- Views: 1010
As data is going to target, it depends on record size in target and no. of records. So approx (record size * total records).
If you are asking about the scratch space required then is would be depndent on the physical memory available for the job in addition to what Kumar_s has mentioned in his post.
If you are asking about the scratch space required then is would be depndent on the physical memory available for the job in addition to what Kumar_s has mentioned in his post.
- Tue Oct 24, 2006 12:21 am
- Forum: IBM<sup>®</sup> DataStage Enterprise Edition (Formerly Parallel Extender/PX)
- Topic: How to append the values
- Replies: 3
- Views: 925
- Tue Oct 24, 2006 12:19 am
- Forum: IBM<sup>®</sup> DataStage Enterprise Edition (Formerly Parallel Extender/PX)
- Topic: Custom transformer jumbling output fields
- Replies: 2
- Views: 1119
This is a bit new to me. Can you please share the answers to the following questions? Have you written the OSH script directly i.e. using OSH command from unix? What's this mainloop code and code following it, where u are saying compile and run the code? Where are you storing the transformer code an...
- Mon Oct 23, 2006 11:59 pm
- Forum: IBM<sup>®</sup> DataStage Enterprise Edition (Formerly Parallel Extender/PX)
- Topic: config file
- Replies: 2
- Views: 1249
- Mon Oct 23, 2006 11:46 pm
- Forum: IBM<sup>®</sup> DataStage Enterprise Edition (Formerly Parallel Extender/PX)
- Topic: Problem while performing operations on the Target table
- Replies: 11
- Views: 45738
Row buffer when set to 1, instead of storing data to be inserted/updated/deleted, is sent to the table directly. When u have buffer with size more than 1 say 10, the rows will be stored in buffer and then 10 rows will be stored in buffer and then they will be sent to table. The buffering and commit ...
- Mon Oct 23, 2006 11:10 pm
- Forum: General
- Topic: The Product Formerly Known as Hawk
- Replies: 12
- Views: 17034
Kirtikumar - I'm not sure what you mean by that, since the design phases don't get affected by the data volumes. ... Arnd, normally when we decide whether project needs to be developed in PX or server, we consider the total number of rows that will be processed in the warehouse. Few of the project ...
- Mon Oct 23, 2006 10:59 pm
- Forum: General
- Topic: XML Plug in Stage..
- Replies: 4
- Views: 3390
- Mon Oct 23, 2006 10:58 pm
- Forum: General
- Topic: XML Plug in Stage..
- Replies: 4
- Views: 3390
Re: XML Plug in Stage..
Are there two problems? From the post it seems u have two problems. First The job is loading the data with the nearest tags. To me it means, for the second row (or other rows than first), it is always reading nearest tags data instead of correspoding data from row. So for XML you have mentioned, are...
- Mon Oct 23, 2006 1:45 am
- Forum: General
- Topic: The Product Formerly Known as Hawk
- Replies: 12
- Views: 17034
Re: The Product Formerly Known as Hawk
Hopefully this will release impact on designing PX or server job depending on total number of rows to be processed.ray.wurlod wrote:parallel job startup time has been markedly reduced
- Mon Oct 23, 2006 1:35 am
- Forum: IBM<sup>®</sup> DataStage Enterprise Edition (Formerly Parallel Extender/PX)
- Topic: How to do look for the greater than or less than date ranges
- Replies: 7
- Views: 3139
Instead of the server shared container, check if the sparse lookup can be used. Sparse lookup allows you to fire queries at runtime. So you have to define Table_A as reference link with key columns mapped to QADATE. Then in SQL in TABLEA, add the query which will have range condition. But keep in mi...
- Thu Oct 19, 2006 10:37 pm
- Forum: General
- Topic: Ship Date, *Stage 8.0
- Replies: 7
- Views: 5392
- Thu Oct 19, 2006 12:56 am
- Forum: IBM<sup>®</sup> DataStage Enterprise Edition (Formerly Parallel Extender/PX)
- Topic: RE:Error
- Replies: 4
- Views: 1503