Search found 95 matches
- Tue Jun 28, 2005 7:40 am
- Forum: IBM<sup>®</sup> Infosphere DataStage Server Edition
- Topic: License Checking by DataStage
- Replies: 10
- Views: 4186
DataStage has been partitioned to see 4 cpu's (2 hyperthreaded). DataStage sees all 32 cpu's. Yep the Unisys box is not bad, one can partition it to the point of having a different OS running each partition. It's like splitting the box into many servers. We have not done that on this box. We have a ...
- Tue Jun 28, 2005 5:38 am
- Forum: IBM<sup>®</sup> Infosphere DataStage Server Edition
- Topic: License Checking by DataStage
- Replies: 10
- Views: 4186
- Tue Jun 28, 2005 3:02 am
- Forum: IBM<sup>®</sup> Infosphere DataStage Server Edition
- Topic: License Checking by DataStage
- Replies: 10
- Views: 4186
Hi Roy According to the guys who set up the partition, it is independent, hence my dilema. Also, call has been logged with Ascential by no joy there either. We use job sequencers and the warning status from the license warning is causing problems because of the warning triggers we have set. I will s...
- Tue Jun 28, 2005 12:59 am
- Forum: IBM<sup>®</sup> Infosphere DataStage Server Edition
- Topic: License Checking by DataStage
- Replies: 10
- Views: 4186
License Checking by DataStage
We have a 32 cpu machine that has been partitioned. DataStage runs under a 4 cpu partition because we have a 4 cpu license. However, when the jobs are run we get warnings in the job logs about violation of the number of cpu's. It seems DataStage does a 'system' scan instead of a partition scan. I ha...
- Wed Jun 08, 2005 6:14 am
- Forum: IBM<sup>®</sup> Infosphere DataStage Server Edition
- Topic: Distributed Hash Files
- Replies: 14
- Views: 5459
- Tue Jun 07, 2005 6:49 am
- Forum: IBM<sup>®</sup> Infosphere DataStage Server Edition
- Topic: Distributed Hash Files
- Replies: 14
- Views: 5459
- Tue Jun 07, 2005 6:06 am
- Forum: IBM<sup>®</sup> Infosphere DataStage Server Edition
- Topic: Distributed Hash Files
- Replies: 14
- Views: 5459
- Tue Jun 07, 2005 4:40 am
- Forum: IBM<sup>®</sup> Infosphere DataStage Server Edition
- Topic: Distributed Hash Files
- Replies: 14
- Views: 5459
1. The job creating the hash files is a multi-instance job. 2. Each instance of the job is passed different parameters for a sql select statement (where akakey >= startkeyvalue and akakey < endkeyvalue). 3. The hash file contains 4 key columns, akakey being the last of the 4. 4. Each key column is d...
- Tue Jun 07, 2005 3:01 am
- Forum: IBM<sup>®</sup> Infosphere DataStage Server Edition
- Topic: Distributed Hash Files
- Replies: 14
- Views: 5459
No sure what you mean Wolfgang. I understand that each hashfile's metadata has to be the same. Here's my dilema...if I use @inrownum to send 1000 rows to hash file 1, the next 1000 rows to hash file 2 etc, how do I specify this in the DEFINE statement when I'm creating the distributed hash file. Can...
- Tue Jun 07, 2005 12:49 am
- Forum: IBM<sup>®</sup> Infosphere DataStage Server Edition
- Topic: Distributed Hash Files
- Replies: 14
- Views: 5459
Distributed Hash Files
Hi Guys I have created a job that creates 10 hash files. Each hash file will be incorporated into a distributed hash file. The average number of rows in each hash file is 6 million. The hash file has 4 columns that make up the key, the constraint in the job is based on the value in only one of the h...
- Tue Jun 07, 2005 12:36 am
- Forum: IBM<sup>®</sup> Infosphere DataStage Server Edition
- Topic: Multi Instance Job
- Replies: 7
- Views: 2151
- Mon Jun 06, 2005 5:51 am
- Forum: IBM<sup>®</sup> Infosphere DataStage Server Edition
- Topic: Multi Instance Job
- Replies: 7
- Views: 2151
Multi Instance Job
I have a job that is marked as a muti-instance job (in the job properties). The job executes without any problems. However, when I try to invoke another instance of the job, it does not allow it (job is already running message). In the Director, the run button is greyed out. :x Do I have to set this...
- Tue May 31, 2005 4:56 am
- Forum: IBM<sup>®</sup> Infosphere DataStage Server Edition
- Topic: Parallel update to DB2
- Replies: 8
- Views: 2630
Hi Vincent I'm not sure I understand what you mean when you say the splitter will only run one cpu. From my understanding, each link out of the splitter will force a new 'thread' which, in turn, will mean the cpu's will be better utilised :? . If this is not the case, then from a performance enhanci...
- Mon May 30, 2005 2:55 am
- Forum: IBM<sup>®</sup> Infosphere DataStage Server Edition
- Topic: Parallel update to DB2
- Replies: 8
- Views: 2630
- Fri May 27, 2005 4:29 am
- Forum: IBM<sup>®</sup> Infosphere DataStage Server Edition
- Topic: Parallel update to DB2
- Replies: 8
- Views: 2630