tunde,
There is a transform under TransformsSDKKeyMgt called KeyMgtGetNextValueConcurrent
I can't see why this wouldn't work on a parallel job.
Good Luck,
Tony
Search found 472 matches
- Wed Jun 18, 2003 9:05 am
- Forum: IBM<sup>®</sup> Infosphere DataStage Server Edition
- Topic: Sequence Generator
- Replies: 8
- Views: 3937
- Wed Jun 18, 2003 7:19 am
- Forum: IBM<sup>®</sup> Infosphere DataStage Server Edition
- Topic: Oracle Advanced Queue
- Replies: 9
- Views: 3474
- Tue Jun 17, 2003 7:00 am
- Forum: IBM<sup>®</sup> Infosphere DataStage Server Edition
- Topic: Oracle Advanced Queue
- Replies: 9
- Views: 3474
Oracle Advanced Queue
Does anyone know if DataStage will work with Oracle Advanced Queue? I see a plug-in for MQ Series and I've seen literature on DataStage and another IBM message queueing product (something about Websphere, I think). I haven't seen anything about it being able to use Oracle Advanced Queue.
Thanks,
Tony
Thanks,
Tony
- Tue Jun 17, 2003 6:39 am
- Forum: IBM<sup>®</sup> Infosphere DataStage Server Edition
- Topic: How to do iterative lookups
- Replies: 13
- Views: 4005
- Mon Jun 16, 2003 3:03 pm
- Forum: IBM<sup>®</sup> Infosphere DataStage Server Edition
- Topic: Code Based ETL to Datastage
- Replies: 9
- Views: 4534
- Mon Jun 16, 2003 2:59 pm
- Forum: IBM<sup>®</sup> Infosphere DataStage Server Edition
- Topic: How to do iterative lookups
- Replies: 13
- Views: 4005
Well, as of a few minutes ago, the requirement to calculate the entire QPA of the entire product was removed. Apparently, the data is incomplete, so all they want is the current part QPA * the NHA QPA. I can do that. For the archives--- I decided to take the original part info and put it in a hash f...
- Mon Jun 16, 2003 10:22 am
- Forum: IBM<sup>®</sup> Infosphere DataStage Server Edition
- Topic: How to do iterative lookups
- Replies: 13
- Views: 4005
Hi Steve, Thanks for the reply. Unfortunately, each part can have multiple next higher assemblies. And, at this point, at least, I'm not sure how to tell if I have bottom level part, or not. I'll read through your post a couple of times and make sure that I understand it, to see if I can adapt it to...
- Sun Jun 15, 2003 8:45 pm
- Forum: IBM<sup>®</sup> Infosphere DataStage Server Edition
- Topic: How to do iterative lookups
- Replies: 13
- Views: 4005
- Sat Jun 14, 2003 10:23 pm
- Forum: IBM<sup>®</sup> Infosphere DataStage Server Edition
- Topic: How to do iterative lookups
- Replies: 13
- Views: 4005
Hi Vincent! I am considering lookup stages for each level of NHA. I hadn't considered shared containers (I've never made one work in v6.0). That's something to think about... I'm not sure of the maximum number of levels at this point. If I can get my users and analysts to admit to a reasonable numbe...
- Fri Jun 13, 2003 3:05 pm
- Forum: IBM<sup>®</sup> Infosphere DataStage Server Edition
- Topic: How to do iterative lookups
- Replies: 13
- Views: 4005
- Fri Jun 13, 2003 12:42 pm
- Forum: IBM<sup>®</sup> Infosphere DataStage Server Edition
- Topic: How to do iterative lookups
- Replies: 13
- Views: 4005
How to do iterative lookups
Hi all, I've got a situation where I need to calculate the number of parts in a product. The product consists of a number of assemblies. Each assemblies may consist of other assemblies. Each of these assemblies will consist of one or more parts. From the part perspective I have a quantity per assemb...
- Thu Jun 12, 2003 6:20 pm
- Forum: IBM<sup>®</sup> Infosphere DataStage Server Edition
- Topic: No rows process through job
- Replies: 19
- Views: 6087
- Thu Jun 12, 2003 5:02 pm
- Forum: IBM<sup>®</sup> Infosphere DataStage Server Edition
- Topic: No rows process through job
- Replies: 19
- Views: 6087
- Thu Jun 12, 2003 11:36 am
- Forum: IBM<sup>®</sup> Infosphere DataStage Server Edition
- Topic: No rows process through job
- Replies: 19
- Views: 6087
- Thu Jun 12, 2003 10:49 am
- Forum: IBM<sup>®</sup> Infosphere DataStage Server Edition
- Topic: No rows process through job
- Replies: 19
- Views: 6087
That might be the answer to speeding it up, Steve. I just looked at the job a minute ago. It has been runnning for almost 24 hours and has processed 12,xxx rows. I think the problem is that the lookups are just taking a loooooooonnnnnngggggg time. So, it actually is processing rows, just very, very ...