Search found 25 matches
- Wed Dec 18, 2013 5:03 am
- Forum: General
- Topic: Calculating with timestamps in a sequence job
- Replies: 4
- Views: 2699
Hi Chulett and Ray, thank you for your help. Unfortunately I can't see Ray's full entry because I'm no premium member (I know that's my own fault ;)). We made a workaround which doesn't really do exactly what it should, but it's enough for the job: We have a load_timestamp for the start of the main ...
- Wed Dec 11, 2013 1:57 am
- Forum: General
- Topic: Calculating with timestamps in a sequence job
- Replies: 4
- Views: 2699
Hi Chulett, what I need it for: I have a loop where I start a wait-for-file-job to see if the file is already here. Let's say they are named File1 ... File32. In my wait-for-file-job I compare the current date with the start date of the main sequence in order to guarantee that the whole searching pr...
- Tue Dec 10, 2013 4:59 pm
- Forum: General
- Topic: Calculating with timestamps in a sequence job
- Replies: 4
- Views: 2699
Calculating with timestamps in a sequence job
Hi datastagers, in order to calculate the period of time between a fix timestamp and the current timestamp I would need something like a SecondsSinceFromTimestamp(fix_timestamp, current_timestamp) in my sequence job but unfortunately haven't found a good possibility to do that so far. Do you have an...
- Tue Oct 29, 2013 3:25 pm
- Forum: IBM<sup>®</sup> DataStage Enterprise Edition (Formerly Parallel Extender/PX)
- Topic: SCD2 on the basis of months
- Replies: 2
- Views: 1540
- Mon Oct 28, 2013 9:23 am
- Forum: IBM<sup>®</sup> DataStage Enterprise Edition (Formerly Parallel Extender/PX)
- Topic: SCD2 on the basis of months
- Replies: 2
- Views: 1540
SCD2 on the basis of months
Hi everybody, I have a little tricky case: Data can be valid on the basis of a month. So a record can be valid from 01.03.2013 to 31.12.2999 for example. CASE 1: changes in the same month of date_from If the record is created in March for example (date_from: 01.03.2013) and changes are made in the S...
- Tue Mar 26, 2013 4:58 am
- Forum: IBM<sup>®</sup> DataStage Enterprise Edition (Formerly Parallel Extender/PX)
- Topic: Parallel job hangs
- Replies: 8
- Views: 3914
We made an additional limitation for the data to work with and the error has never come again. So I agree with you, that it is a space limitation/performance problem. Unfortunately I have no access or answer from a db admin, which would have been very interestering and helpful for the upcoming proje...
- Mon Feb 25, 2013 10:10 am
- Forum: IBM<sup>®</sup> DataStage Enterprise Edition (Formerly Parallel Extender/PX)
- Topic: Parallel job hangs
- Replies: 8
- Views: 3914
- Mon Feb 25, 2013 8:49 am
- Forum: IBM<sup>®</sup> DataStage Enterprise Edition (Formerly Parallel Extender/PX)
- Topic: Parallel job hangs
- Replies: 8
- Views: 3914
- Mon Feb 25, 2013 3:50 am
- Forum: IBM<sup>®</sup> DataStage Enterprise Edition (Formerly Parallel Extender/PX)
- Topic: Parallel job hangs
- Replies: 8
- Views: 3914
- Mon Feb 25, 2013 2:58 am
- Forum: IBM<sup>®</sup> DataStage Enterprise Edition (Formerly Parallel Extender/PX)
- Topic: Parallel job hangs
- Replies: 8
- Views: 3914
Parallel job hangs
Hi everybody, there's something curiously going on in my datastage jobs: I have some (data intensive) SCD1-jobs with a lot of look ups. Most of the time they finish, but very often I have the last log entry for 6 o'clock when I check it at 9 o'clock and it should run approx. 1 hour. When I stop and ...
- Mon Jul 09, 2012 1:41 am
- Forum: IBM<sup>®</sup> DataStage Enterprise Edition (Formerly Parallel Extender/PX)
- Topic: Surrogate Key with included Effective Date
- Replies: 12
- Views: 7169
- Wed Jun 27, 2012 12:52 am
- Forum: IBM<sup>®</sup> DataStage Enterprise Edition (Formerly Parallel Extender/PX)
- Topic: Surrogate Key with included Effective Date
- Replies: 12
- Views: 7169
- Mon Jun 25, 2012 12:45 am
- Forum: IBM<sup>®</sup> DataStage Enterprise Edition (Formerly Parallel Extender/PX)
- Topic: Surrogate Key with included Effective Date
- Replies: 12
- Views: 7169
Thank you for your ideas so far. @ jwiles: Yes, unfortunately I HAVE to use the same SK with another date because of foreign keys. That makes using the SCD stage not really simple. @ SURA: You mean a stored procedure where I check if an update happens and if yes, I keep the SK? I'm asking this (perh...
- Sun Jun 24, 2012 2:42 pm
- Forum: IBM<sup>®</sup> DataStage Enterprise Edition (Formerly Parallel Extender/PX)
- Topic: Surrogate Key with included Effective Date
- Replies: 12
- Views: 7169
- Sat Jun 23, 2012 9:55 am
- Forum: IBM<sup>®</sup> DataStage Enterprise Edition (Formerly Parallel Extender/PX)
- Topic: Surrogate Key with included Effective Date
- Replies: 12
- Views: 7169
Surrogate Key with included Effective Date
Hi everybody, due to foreign keys which I have to consider in my core dwh, I need a combined surrogate key which consists of the "surrogate key id" + the effective date. I have to realize that via the SCD stage of DataStage. I either get an error for violating constraints or too little dat...