![Smile :)](./images/smilies/icon_smile.gif)
Search found 376 matches
- Thu May 30, 2013 2:50 am
- Forum: General
- Topic: It took more than ten years
- Replies: 11
- Views: 7084
- Thu May 30, 2013 12:07 am
- Forum: General
- Topic: Windowing Function Range Between Dates
- Replies: 10
- Views: 3653
- Thu May 30, 2013 12:00 am
- Forum: General
- Topic: Windowing Function Range Between Dates
- Replies: 10
- Views: 3653
- Wed May 29, 2013 7:07 am
- Forum: General
- Topic: Windowing Function Range Between Dates
- Replies: 10
- Views: 3653
- Wed May 29, 2013 4:59 am
- Forum: General
- Topic: Windowing Function Range Between Dates
- Replies: 10
- Views: 3653
Windowing Function Range Between Dates
Hi, I wasn't too sure if this was the right place to post but I'm sure there are some SQL gurus here too. Kindly help. We have a table that looks something like LN_NBR RPT_DATE SN_AMT My requirement is to select the MIN(SN_AMT) for a given LN_NBR within a given set of RPT_DATE. The RPT_DATE range is...
- Sat May 25, 2013 12:01 pm
- Forum: IBM<sup>®</sup> DataStage Enterprise Edition (Formerly Parallel Extender/PX)
- Topic: How to calculate running totals (cumulative) based on a col?
- Replies: 25
- Views: 12866
- Fri May 24, 2013 2:04 am
- Forum: IBM<sup>®</sup> DataStage Enterprise Edition (Formerly Parallel Extender/PX)
- Topic: Credibility of Checksum and Alternatives
- Replies: 14
- Views: 6577
- Thu May 23, 2013 1:23 am
- Forum: IBM<sup>®</sup> DataStage Enterprise Edition (Formerly Parallel Extender/PX)
- Topic: Credibility of Checksum and Alternatives
- Replies: 14
- Views: 6577
- Thu May 23, 2013 12:16 am
- Forum: IBM<sup>®</sup> DataStage Enterprise Edition (Formerly Parallel Extender/PX)
- Topic: Credibility of Checksum and Alternatives
- Replies: 14
- Views: 6577
- Wed May 22, 2013 10:37 pm
- Forum: IBM<sup>®</sup> DataStage Enterprise Edition (Formerly Parallel Extender/PX)
- Topic: Inner Join
- Replies: 6
- Views: 3423
- Wed May 22, 2013 6:32 am
- Forum: IBM<sup>®</sup> DataStage Enterprise Edition (Formerly Parallel Extender/PX)
- Topic: Credibility of Checksum and Alternatives
- Replies: 14
- Views: 6577
- Wed May 22, 2013 6:10 am
- Forum: IBM<sup>®</sup> DataStage Enterprise Edition (Formerly Parallel Extender/PX)
- Topic: Credibility of Checksum and Alternatives
- Replies: 14
- Views: 6577
I thought that comparing a single Checksum column would be more efficient than comparing each of the 40-50 columns. This is my idea behind using Checksum. To answer your second question - This is not going to be a daily batch job that's going to go live but is going to be run every day for the next ...
- Wed May 22, 2013 3:00 am
- Forum: IBM<sup>®</sup> DataStage Enterprise Edition (Formerly Parallel Extender/PX)
- Topic: Credibility of Checksum and Alternatives
- Replies: 14
- Views: 6577
Credibility of Checksum and Alternatives
We're trying to do some work on trying to find if the incremental data provided by our client's partners are indeed reliable and if yes, to what degree. To achieve this, we are performing the below exercise: 1. Day 1 - Take a full extract of the source from the partner for Day 1 2. Day 2 - Take a fu...
- Tue May 21, 2013 10:10 pm
- Forum: General
- Topic: SOURCE AND TARGET STAGE COUNT
- Replies: 11
- Views: 6342
If on DataStage 8.5 or below, this is what I could think of. $INCLUDE DSINCLUDE JOBCONTROL.H Link_Handle = DSAttachJob(JobName,DSJ.ERRNONE) PenultimateStageName = DSGetLinkInfo(Link_Handle,TargetStageName,LinkName,DSJ.LINKSTAGE) Ans=DSGetLinkInfo(Link_Handle,PenultimateStageName,LinkName,DSJ.LINKROW...
- Tue May 21, 2013 4:32 am
- Forum: General
- Topic: SOURCE AND TARGET STAGE COUNT
- Replies: 11
- Views: 6342