Sorry for reapeted posts,
You mean (NextSurrogateKey() + @PARTITIONNUM) + @NUMPARTITIONS
Search found 182 matches
- Mon Nov 19, 2007 2:58 pm
- Forum: IBM<sup>®</sup> DataStage Enterprise Edition (Formerly Parallel Extender/PX)
- Topic: Generating Sequence numbers in Parallel Transormer
- Replies: 20
- Views: 10294
- Mon Nov 19, 2007 2:56 pm
- Forum: IBM<sup>®</sup> DataStage Enterprise Edition (Formerly Parallel Extender/PX)
- Topic: Generating Sequence numbers in Parallel Transormer
- Replies: 20
- Views: 10294
- Mon Nov 19, 2007 2:54 pm
- Forum: IBM<sup>®</sup> DataStage Enterprise Edition (Formerly Parallel Extender/PX)
- Topic: Generating Sequence numbers in Parallel Transormer
- Replies: 20
- Views: 10294
- Mon Nov 19, 2007 2:43 pm
- Forum: IBM<sup>®</sup> DataStage Enterprise Edition (Formerly Parallel Extender/PX)
- Topic: Generating Sequence numbers in Parallel Transormer
- Replies: 20
- Views: 10294
Generating Sequence numbers in Parallel Transormer
Hi All, Scenario 1. Generating Sequence numbers by using Surrogate key option with NextSurrogateKey() utility in Parallel Transform stage. Scenario 2. calling System varibales @OUTROWNUM in output derivation. in both Scenario's DataStage job is generating even numbers, I know this is because of more...
- Fri Nov 16, 2007 11:17 am
- Forum: IBM<sup>®</sup> DataStage Enterprise Edition (Formerly Parallel Extender/PX)
- Topic: DataSet error
- Replies: 6
- Views: 2619
- Fri Nov 16, 2007 8:34 am
- Forum: IBM<sup>®</sup> DataStage Enterprise Edition (Formerly Parallel Extender/PX)
- Topic: DataSet error
- Replies: 6
- Views: 2619
Hi Ray, It is not that I want to trouble you by pasting job OSH, but I am trying to make sense out-of it where I am going wrong. Below is the OSH from 3 source DataSet's in the job and I find EFFECTIVE_FROM_DATE is existing. Any idea how can I fix this error. ########################################...
- Thu Nov 15, 2007 2:06 pm
- Forum: IBM<sup>®</sup> DataStage Enterprise Edition (Formerly Parallel Extender/PX)
- Topic: DataSet error
- Replies: 6
- Views: 2619
- Thu Nov 15, 2007 2:02 pm
- Forum: IBM<sup>®</sup> DataStage Enterprise Edition (Formerly Parallel Extender/PX)
- Topic: Change_Capture
- Replies: 2
- Views: 1434
Change_Capture
Hi All,
I have TONS of these error messages, any clue where can I fix this error in Change Capture stage.
Change_Capture_320: When checking operator: Defaulting "CITY_NAME" in transfer from "beforeRec" to "outputRec".
Thanks
srimitta
I have TONS of these error messages, any clue where can I fix this error in Change Capture stage.
Change_Capture_320: When checking operator: Defaulting "CITY_NAME" in transfer from "beforeRec" to "outputRec".
Thanks
srimitta
- Wed Nov 14, 2007 10:13 am
- Forum: IBM<sup>®</sup> DataStage Enterprise Edition (Formerly Parallel Extender/PX)
- Topic: DataSet error
- Replies: 6
- Views: 2619
DataSet error
Hi All, I was able to create DataSet sucessfully but while reading I have below error and when I checked EFFECTIVE_FROM_DATE is existing. Error executing View Data command: ##E IIS-DSEE-TOPK-00007 11:15:06(008) <_PEEK_IDENT_> Input dataset does not have field: "EFFECTIVE_FROM_DATE". Any id...
- Wed Nov 07, 2007 11:00 am
- Forum: IBM<sup>®</sup> DataStage Enterprise Edition (Formerly Parallel Extender/PX)
- Topic: NextSurrogateKey()
- Replies: 18
- Views: 14987
Hi Mhester, I don't see APT_DISABLE_COMBINATION in job log. Ok..let me see if I can give you more info, here is the log. When APT_DISABLE_COMBINATION is set to False -Transformer_45,1: Failure during execution of operator logic. -APT_CombinedOperatorController,0: Internal Error: (start <= end): surr...
- Wed Nov 07, 2007 9:54 am
- Forum: IBM<sup>®</sup> DataStage Enterprise Edition (Formerly Parallel Extender/PX)
- Topic: NextSurrogateKey()
- Replies: 18
- Views: 14987
Hey Craig, I found your posting. This is what with you are trying to help in resloving 'gdb' and 'sed' If you run them separately, do they run without this error? Edit - nm, I see you already said they did. To me, that would imply you could have overloaded your database. There is typically a paramet...
- Wed Nov 07, 2007 9:27 am
- Forum: IBM<sup>®</sup> DataStage Enterprise Edition (Formerly Parallel Extender/PX)
- Topic: NextSurrogateKey()
- Replies: 18
- Views: 14987
I have tried using your method, GREAT, but still I have same error APT_CombinedOperatorController,1: Internal Error: (start <= end): surrkey/keystate.C: 73 Traceback: Could not obtain stack trace; check that 'gdb' and 'sed' are installed and on your PATH what does check that 'gdb' and 'sed' are inst...
- Wed Nov 07, 2007 8:12 am
- Forum: IBM<sup>®</sup> DataStage Enterprise Edition (Formerly Parallel Extender/PX)
- Topic: NextSurrogateKey()
- Replies: 18
- Views: 14987
- Wed Nov 07, 2007 8:12 am
- Forum: IBM<sup>®</sup> DataStage Enterprise Edition (Formerly Parallel Extender/PX)
- Topic: NextSurrogateKey()
- Replies: 18
- Views: 14987
- Wed Nov 07, 2007 7:34 am
- Forum: IBM<sup>®</sup> DataStage Enterprise Edition (Formerly Parallel Extender/PX)
- Topic: NextSurrogateKey()
- Replies: 18
- Views: 14987
Hi Ray I also tried to use Stage but job Aborted with below warning: Surrogate_Key_Generator_48,0: Internal Error: (start <= end): surrkey/keystate.C: 73 Traceback: Could not obtain stack trace; check that 'gdb' and 'sed' are installed and on your PATH When checked from command line 'gdb' and 'sed' ...