Search found 353 matches
- Fri Jan 04, 2013 5:06 am
- Forum: IBM<sup>®</sup> DataStage Enterprise Edition (Formerly Parallel Extender/PX)
- Topic: ODBC Enterprise & ODBC Connector
- Replies: 3
- Views: 2246
- Fri Jan 04, 2013 12:51 am
- Forum: IBM<sup>®</sup> DataStage Enterprise Edition (Formerly Parallel Extender/PX)
- Topic: Change Capture
- Replies: 3
- Views: 1974
I am not able to see what ArndW has suggested. Normally we avoid doing insert and updates separately in the same job because locking can happen. Also if your data is like inserts should happen first or an update record can exist for new incoming record then surely inserts should happen first. And it...
- Thu Jan 03, 2013 12:16 am
- Forum: IBM<sup>®</sup> DataStage Enterprise Edition (Formerly Parallel Extender/PX)
- Topic: Reject link attached to source DB2 connector stage
- Replies: 8
- Views: 4357
- Thu Dec 27, 2012 12:01 am
- Forum: IBM<sup>®</sup> DataStage Enterprise Edition (Formerly Parallel Extender/PX)
- Topic: STP Stage
- Replies: 2
- Views: 1886
- Thu Dec 20, 2012 5:09 am
- Forum: IBM<sup>®</sup> DataStage Enterprise Edition (Formerly Parallel Extender/PX)
- Topic: Which partition type I need to use in the JOIN stage
- Replies: 7
- Views: 6106
Does auto partition will work without flaw for any volume of data? Especially in JOIN / LOOKUP? Yes, it works all the time. In my project we process lot of data(my client is the biggest Bank of India 8)). We always use auto partitioning and till now there's no discrepancy in the data. There's NO ha...
- Tue Dec 18, 2012 4:55 am
- Forum: IBM<sup>®</sup> DataStage Enterprise Edition (Formerly Parallel Extender/PX)
- Topic: Which partition type I need to use in the JOIN stage
- Replies: 7
- Views: 6106
- Thu Dec 13, 2012 11:30 pm
- Forum: IBM<sup>®</sup> DataStage Enterprise Edition (Formerly Parallel Extender/PX)
- Topic: How to handle Blob ?
- Replies: 10
- Views: 3938
- Thu Dec 13, 2012 6:13 am
- Forum: IBM<sup>®</sup> DataStage Enterprise Edition (Formerly Parallel Extender/PX)
- Topic: A bit difficult requirement
- Replies: 6
- Views: 3345
- Wed Dec 12, 2012 8:23 am
- Forum: IBM<sup>®</sup> DataStage Enterprise Edition (Formerly Parallel Extender/PX)
- Topic: A bit difficult requirement
- Replies: 6
- Views: 3345
@Chetan As I told only record with TYPE = 36 will go in the o/p. So for ACCT = 100, the RECNO will come from the just previous(larger) RECNO(in this case 10). The NAME will always come from TYPE = 36(NOT TYPE = 1) @Craig In the transformer, partitioning is on ACCT with RECNO sorted desc. stage varia...
- Wed Dec 12, 2012 5:17 am
- Forum: IBM<sup>®</sup> DataStage Enterprise Edition (Formerly Parallel Extender/PX)
- Topic: A bit difficult requirement
- Replies: 6
- Views: 3345
just to add that I have tried a logic in the transformer where I partition the data on ACCT and sort on RECNO desc. Now I also used stage variables where I check the old ACCT with new ACCT. I am getting the data as I require except the RECNO is not coming correctly. I have mentioned above that the R...
- Wed Dec 12, 2012 5:05 am
- Forum: IBM<sup>®</sup> DataStage Enterprise Edition (Formerly Parallel Extender/PX)
- Topic: A bit difficult requirement
- Replies: 6
- Views: 3345
A bit difficult requirement
Hi All, Sample Data ACCT RECNO TYPE NAME 100 11 1 Null 200 19 36 AA 200 20 1 Null 300 29 1 Null 100 10 36 BB 100 8 1 Null 300 27 36 CC 300 28 1 Null Output Data ACCT RECNO TYPE NAME 200 20 36 AA 100 11 36 BB 300 28 36 CC Conditions/Constraints Records with TYPE = 36 will go in the o/p but the RECNO ...
- Mon Nov 19, 2012 11:07 pm
- Forum: IBM<sup>®</sup> DataStage Enterprise Edition (Formerly Parallel Extender/PX)
- Topic: New Line in Date Field
- Replies: 10
- Views: 3723
- Mon Nov 19, 2012 1:49 am
- Forum: IBM<sup>®</sup> DataStage Enterprise Edition (Formerly Parallel Extender/PX)
- Topic: New Line in Date Field
- Replies: 10
- Views: 3723
My Data looks like
Here for ID = 3 and 4, I want date as Null.
But above logic is not working correctly.
Code: Select all
ID|Date
1|2009-12-12
2|2012-01-01
3|\N
4|\N
But above logic is not working correctly.
- Mon Nov 19, 2012 1:31 am
- Forum: IBM<sup>®</sup> DataStage Enterprise Edition (Formerly Parallel Extender/PX)
- Topic: New Line in Date Field
- Replies: 10
- Views: 3723
New Line in Date Field
Hi, My source is a sequential file and I am reading date columns as Varchar(10). My problem is the date fields contains \N character. I want these dates as Null so using the below logic but still logic is not working as it is supposed to work. If TRIM(Lnk_Src_To_Trf.EXTRNL_RTNG_STRT_DT) = '\N' Then ...
- Mon Nov 12, 2012 5:10 am
- Forum: General
- Topic: DSJOB command
- Replies: 6
- Views: 3210