Search found 246 matches
- Wed Mar 16, 2011 8:13 am
- Forum: IBM<sup>®</sup> SOA Editions (Formerly RTI Services)
- Topic: Roll back issue in a service
- Replies: 11
- Views: 9838
Thanks for the Info. Actually we have 8.5 in development and planning for 8.5 in test and prod eventually. But as we dont have test and prod in 8.5 and 8.5 is incompatible to 8.0 we are designing in 8.0 dev. I will try to design it in 8.5 once we get test and prod, can you please let me know what ch...
- Tue Mar 15, 2011 2:48 pm
- Forum: IBM<sup>®</sup> SOA Editions (Formerly RTI Services)
- Topic: Roll back issue in a service
- Replies: 11
- Views: 9838
- Tue Mar 15, 2011 2:25 pm
- Forum: IBM<sup>®</sup> SOA Editions (Formerly RTI Services)
- Topic: Roll back issue in a service
- Replies: 11
- Views: 9838
- Tue Mar 15, 2011 1:05 pm
- Forum: IBM<sup>®</sup> SOA Editions (Formerly RTI Services)
- Topic: Roll back issue in a service
- Replies: 11
- Views: 9838
It is a batch job which is invoked as a service from ISD and the job as WISD input and WISD output stages. This is 8.0.1 release and the job is a parallel job. As this is always on service it runs 24*7 i.e always. The request is around 6 fields and this is validated with some tables and then inserte...
- Tue Mar 15, 2011 9:50 am
- Forum: IBM<sup>®</sup> SOA Editions (Formerly RTI Services)
- Topic: Roll back issue in a service
- Replies: 11
- Views: 9838
Roll back issue in a service
I have a service oriented job which has around 30 to 40 odbc PX connectors. I use most of the connectors to insert or update, When the service is called and a request is sent sometimes the service aborts which ends with inserting or updating only some of the tables, my requirement is if the service ...
- Thu Mar 10, 2011 12:02 pm
- Forum: IBM<sup>®</sup> DataStage Enterprise Edition (Formerly Parallel Extender/PX)
- Topic: Records drop in Transformer.
- Replies: 4
- Views: 4076
- Thu Mar 10, 2011 8:28 am
- Forum: IBM<sup>®</sup> DataStage Enterprise Edition (Formerly Parallel Extender/PX)
- Topic: Records drop in Transformer.
- Replies: 4
- Views: 4076
Records drop in Transformer.
Field 'state_cd2' from input dataset '0' is NULL. Record dropped
I see this kind of warnings more in the director.
Actually we have values for the provided fields but why does it show NULL.
As it is null it drops.
any suggestions please
I see this kind of warnings more in the director.
Actually we have values for the provided fields but why does it show NULL.
As it is null it drops.
any suggestions please
- Thu Mar 10, 2011 8:25 am
- Forum: IBM<sup>®</sup> DataStage Enterprise Edition (Formerly Parallel Extender/PX)
- Topic: cannot see the status of job running in the designer
- Replies: 5
- Views: 2125
- Wed Mar 09, 2011 6:07 pm
- Forum: IBM<sup>®</sup> DataStage Enterprise Edition (Formerly Parallel Extender/PX)
- Topic: cannot see the status of job running in the designer
- Replies: 5
- Views: 2125
- Wed Mar 09, 2011 4:20 pm
- Forum: IBM<sup>®</sup> DataStage Enterprise Edition (Formerly Parallel Extender/PX)
- Topic: cannot see the status of job running in the designer
- Replies: 5
- Views: 2125
cannot see the status of job running in the designer
Hello,
A simple doubt about the status of jobs.
When we run the jobs in the designer, I can see blue first and then red if aborts and green if finished.
Now I cannot see anything in the designer when the job finishes or aborts not even the blue color.
help me with any settings?
A simple doubt about the status of jobs.
When we run the jobs in the designer, I can see blue first and then red if aborts and green if finished.
Now I cannot see anything in the designer when the job finishes or aborts not even the blue color.
help me with any settings?
- Tue Mar 01, 2011 11:26 am
- Forum: IBM QualityStage
- Topic: Validating address using CASS
- Replies: 8
- Views: 4962
Validating address using CASS
I have to design a job in which the source contains 1 million of addresses and the target should be the validated addresses from the source. For this validation source----->cass----->standardization----->target or Source------>standardization--------->cass------->target please let me know which shou...
- Wed Feb 16, 2011 6:27 pm
- Forum: IBM QualityStage
- Topic: Match specification
- Replies: 11
- Views: 6032
So, just play around with the blocking and matching criteria. Yes, I standardized the data Using USNAME---->firstname,lastname Using USAREA---->city,state,zip UsingUSADDR----->addr1,addr2,addr3 After standardizing I used match frequency for the frequency data for source and reference. But what happe...
- Tue Feb 15, 2011 1:20 pm
- Forum: IBM QualityStage
- Topic: Match specification
- Replies: 11
- Views: 6032
The blocking columns in the three passes were 1.NYSIISfirstname,last_name,zip 2.License_num,License_state,gender 3.last_name,gender,first_name The matching commands contain the other columns firstname,middlename,street_no,first_init,gender,last_name this is reference match and has onetomany multiple...
- Mon Feb 14, 2011 11:06 am
- Forum: IBM QualityStage
- Topic: Match specification
- Replies: 11
- Views: 6032
- Sat Feb 12, 2011 2:59 pm
- Forum: IBM QualityStage
- Topic: Match specification
- Replies: 11
- Views: 6032
Source has 3 million records and the reference has 0.2 million records. The source and reference along with their frequency's have been matched using reference match with a match specification which has 3 passes. The outputs I used for the match reference are matched and clerical. After I run the jo...