DataStage timestamp. All three are DS timestamp.ArndW wrote:What is the datatype of the EFFECTIVE_TIME and TO_TIME columns? Can you convert these explicitly to timestamp before the filter stage?
Search found 137 matches
- Mon Aug 02, 2010 8:52 am
- Forum: IBM<sup>®</sup> DataStage Enterprise Edition (Formerly Parallel Extender/PX)
- Topic: Fatal Error: Invalid Julian day in Filter Stage
- Replies: 5
- Views: 5324
- Fri Jul 30, 2010 3:29 pm
- Forum: IBM<sup>®</sup> DataStage Enterprise Edition (Formerly Parallel Extender/PX)
- Topic: Fatal Error: Invalid Julian day in Filter Stage
- Replies: 5
- Views: 5324
Fatal Error: Invalid Julian day in Filter Stage
Hi folks, Peek stage shows this data: RECORDED_TIME:2008-09-23 11:36:00 EFFECTIVE_TIME:2008-09-20 03:14:00 TO_TIME:2008-09-20 14:10:00 Filter stage with this where clause: RECORDED_TIME BETWEEN EFFECTIVE_TIME AND TO_TIME or with this where clause: RECORDED_TIME >= EFFECTIVE_TIME AND RECORDED_TIME < ...
- Fri Jul 30, 2010 2:14 pm
- Forum: IBM<sup>®</sup> DataStage Enterprise Edition (Formerly Parallel Extender/PX)
- Topic: Fatal Error: Updatable lookup requires sorted keys.
- Replies: 8
- Views: 7199
- Fri Jul 30, 2010 12:07 pm
- Forum: IBM<sup>®</sup> DataStage Enterprise Edition (Formerly Parallel Extender/PX)
- Topic: Fatal Error: Updatable lookup requires sorted keys.
- Replies: 8
- Views: 7199
Hi guys, I am trying this idea of doing a lookup on the key, and then using a filter to apply the date logic, but I don't think the lookup is working. If the reference returns more than one row, does it operate like a join, or does it ignore the duplicates? My rowcount going in is the same as the ro...
- Thu Jul 29, 2010 3:10 pm
- Forum: IBM<sup>®</sup> DataStage Enterprise Edition (Formerly Parallel Extender/PX)
- Topic: SQL Logic
- Replies: 10
- Views: 2485
Re: SQL Logic
Does this encourage garbage collection?kris007 wrote:And feed the output link of the LookUp Stage to a Copy Stage or Sequential file stage with path /dev/null
- Wed Jul 28, 2010 11:23 pm
- Forum: IBM<sup>®</sup> DataStage Enterprise Edition (Formerly Parallel Extender/PX)
- Topic: Fatal Error: Updatable lookup requires sorted keys.
- Replies: 8
- Views: 7199
Thanks for the clarification. I'm submitting a ticket to see what IBM has to say. In the meantime I think I'll try your idea of using the lookup to match the keys. Up until now, I've always had unique rows in the lookup, so I guess you're saying multiple rows from the reference link just lead to mul...
- Wed Jul 28, 2010 4:24 pm
- Forum: IBM<sup>®</sup> DataStage Enterprise Edition (Formerly Parallel Extender/PX)
- Topic: Fatal Error: Updatable lookup requires sorted keys.
- Replies: 8
- Views: 7199
Re: Fatal Error: Updatable lookup requires sorted keys.
You can join just the StreamKey and RefKey and bring all the columns downstream into a Transformer or Filter Stage and then apply the logic StreamDate is between RefDate1 and RefDate2 That should work fine. Hi thanks. Joining the StreamKey and the RefKey requires sorting and repartitioning the stre...
- Wed Jul 28, 2010 2:52 pm
- Forum: IBM<sup>®</sup> DataStage Enterprise Edition (Formerly Parallel Extender/PX)
- Topic: Fatal Error: Updatable lookup requires sorted keys.
- Replies: 8
- Views: 7199
Fatal Error: Updatable lookup requires sorted keys.
Hi folks, there are many range lookup problems posted here, so I realize I am adding to a pile, but I haven't seen this particular issue resolved so I am posting it before submitting a ticket. I have a Varchar Key and a date on the stream: StreamKey StreamDate I have the same key, and a pair of date...
- Fri Jul 23, 2010 5:38 pm
- Forum: IBM<sup>®</sup> DataStage Enterprise Edition (Formerly Parallel Extender/PX)
- Topic: TimestampToString Format String Requirements
- Replies: 1
- Views: 4661
TimestampToString Format String Requirements
Hi folks, in a transformer derivation I find that this works fine: TimestampToString(lnk_lkp_ip_flowsheet_rows.RECORDED_TIME,"%yyyy-%mm-%dd %hh:%nn:%ss") But this: TimestampToString(lnk_lkp_ip_flowsheet_rows.RECORDED_TIME,"%hh:%nn:%ss") throws the following: APT_CombinedOperatorC...
- Thu Jul 22, 2010 11:07 am
- Forum: IBM<sup>®</sup> DataStage Enterprise Edition (Formerly Parallel Extender/PX)
- Topic: SIGINT in Director
- Replies: 13
- Views: 3937
- Wed Jul 21, 2010 5:04 pm
- Forum: IBM<sup>®</sup> DataStage Enterprise Edition (Formerly Parallel Extender/PX)
- Topic: SIGINT in Director
- Replies: 13
- Views: 3937
Is JobMonApp running or disabled? Are you collecting performance statistics when running from Director? Not sure about the former. I'm not sure how to check this. For the latter, I do not have the jobs set to record performance data on the job properties execution tab. Regarding the problem startin...
- Tue Jul 20, 2010 5:41 pm
- Forum: IBM<sup>®</sup> DataStage Enterprise Edition (Formerly Parallel Extender/PX)
- Topic: Scratch Cleanup
- Replies: 6
- Views: 2140
- Tue Jul 20, 2010 5:39 pm
- Forum: IBM<sup>®</sup> DataStage Enterprise Edition (Formerly Parallel Extender/PX)
- Topic: SIGINT in Director
- Replies: 13
- Views: 3937
Disable RCP to see whether that resolves the issue. If it does, try to discover why the additional, unspecified columns might have raised an interrupt signal. Hi, RCP is not enabled. I'm not sure that these warnings have anything to do with it. Again, the jobs run just fine when launched from Desig...
- Tue Jul 20, 2010 1:32 pm
- Forum: IBM<sup>®</sup> DataStage Enterprise Edition (Formerly Parallel Extender/PX)
- Topic: SIGINT in Director
- Replies: 13
- Views: 3937
Is this a Job Sequence or just a parallel job? Are you getting any warnings before you get the SIGINT error. Can you post any warnings from director log? Couple of reasons why SIGINT error occurs is when someone tries to stop the job or if the number of warnings exceed the limit mentioned in the Jo...
- Tue Jul 20, 2010 1:12 pm
- Forum: IBM<sup>®</sup> DataStage Enterprise Edition (Formerly Parallel Extender/PX)
- Topic: SIGINT in Director
- Replies: 13
- Views: 3937