Search found 137 matches

by dougcl
Fri Aug 27, 2010 12:00 pm
Forum:
Topic: Table Definitions vs Database Tables
Replies: 3
Views: 1499

Check this out.... http://dsrealtime.wordpress.com/2010/07/02/what-are-shared-table-definitions/ Ernie Hi ernie, one quick question, referring to your article and the list of import methods you describe, what is the behavior of MW when a table is imported that already exists? In the case of the DS ...
by dougcl
Fri Aug 27, 2010 11:45 am
Forum:
Topic: Shared Tables in MW
Replies: 9
Views: 4416

Hi Ernie, I still don't know how to connect Cognos to MW. It looks like the easiest way is to go through Cognos Go! In the Business Glossary setup. We are getting the gosearch function installed on our Cognos server for this purpose. We don't have Fast Track (IBM gave us the impression that this was...
by dougcl
Thu Aug 26, 2010 7:54 pm
Forum:
Topic: Table Definitions vs Database Tables
Replies: 3
Views: 1499

Table Definitions vs Database Tables

Hi folks, I am a little confused about the role of Table Definitions in MW. While they are critical in DataStage, and I can see them in MW, and I can see what stages depend on them in Workbench, there is no option to show lineage or impacts on them in WB. Furthermore, they don't appear in any impact...
by dougcl
Thu Aug 26, 2010 7:46 pm
Forum:
Topic: Shared Tables in MW
Replies: 9
Views: 4416

Hi folks, what is the recommended workflow with MW and DataStage? Do I import Oracle tables into MW and then cascade them down to DataStage? Do all imports and updates happen directly on MW? Or do I import into DataStage and share them up to MW? Seems this doesn't work because updates to Table Defs ...
by dougcl
Wed Aug 25, 2010 6:13 pm
Forum: IBM<sup>®</sup> DataStage Enterprise Edition (Formerly Parallel Extender/PX)
Topic: Scheduler Error loading connector library libccora10g.
Replies: 5
Views: 4465

Ray, thanks so much for these recommendations. I'll look into it.

Doug
by dougcl
Wed Aug 25, 2010 6:12 pm
Forum: IBM<sup>®</sup> DataStage Enterprise Edition (Formerly Parallel Extender/PX)
Topic: Reducing Swap Usage in Simple Jobs
Replies: 9
Views: 2794

mhester wrote:Doug,
GREAT POST. Thanks a lot.
by dougcl
Wed Aug 25, 2010 12:33 am
Forum: IBM<sup>®</sup> DataStage Enterprise Edition (Formerly Parallel Extender/PX)
Topic: Reducing Swap Usage in Simple Jobs
Replies: 9
Views: 2794

You can certainly tune memory in the Sort stage, up or down, but if the system is already swapping heavily I'd be more inclined to figure out what's causing that. Is it genuine swap (to system swap space) or is it usage of the scratchdisk resources mentioned in your configuration file? If the latte...
by dougcl
Wed Aug 25, 2010 12:24 am
Forum: IBM<sup>®</sup> DataStage Enterprise Edition (Formerly Parallel Extender/PX)
Topic: Scheduler Error loading connector library libccora10g.
Replies: 5
Views: 4465

ray.wurlod wrote:Never encountered it, but can you source the dsenv script in the script that cron runs?
Hi Ray, normally yes, but in this case, the cron entry is created by Director.
Doug
by dougcl
Tue Aug 24, 2010 5:53 pm
Forum: IBM<sup>®</sup> DataStage Enterprise Edition (Formerly Parallel Extender/PX)
Topic: Scheduler Error loading connector library libccora10g.
Replies: 5
Views: 4465

Scheduler Error loading connector library libccora10g.

Hi folks, everything runs fine firing things off from Director manually, but scheduled jobs fail with Error loading connector library libccora10g.so I chased this down to the cron process requiring the LD_LIBRARY_PATH specified in $DSHOME/dsenv, but I'm not sure where to go from here. Has anyone sol...
by dougcl
Tue Aug 24, 2010 5:43 pm
Forum: IBM<sup>®</sup> DataStage Enterprise Edition (Formerly Parallel Extender/PX)
Topic: Reducing Swap Usage in Simple Jobs
Replies: 9
Views: 2794

Hi folks, any idea why simple jobs of the form Oracle Connector->Sort->Dataset consume 3.2GB of swap space per instance, independent of the amount of data they are transferring? Perhaps more simply, are there parameters I can tune (like limit MB in the sort stage) to reduce this footprint? Thanks, D...
by dougcl
Mon Aug 23, 2010 6:33 pm
Forum: IBM<sup>®</sup> DataStage Enterprise Edition (Formerly Parallel Extender/PX)
Topic: Reducing Swap Usage in Simple Jobs
Replies: 9
Views: 2794

Reducing Swap Usage in Simple Jobs

Hi folks, I have a bunch of very simple extract jobs. OracleConnector->Sort->DataSet. With 16 partitions, I am finding that each one of these jobs requires about 3.2GB of swap space (based on using vmstat while the jobs are running). At this rate I consume all 30GB of my "available" swap a...
by dougcl
Tue Aug 10, 2010 4:10 pm
Forum: IBM<sup>®</sup> DataStage Enterprise Edition (Formerly Parallel Extender/PX)
Topic: Removing the warning. "will partition despite the prese
Replies: 5
Views: 4776

Providing SAME partition would never creates this warning. But when you dont want the same partition as the previous stage? When you end up in re-partitioning? What I find is that if any input requires a repartition, then all of the inputs must have the flag cleared, even if they are set to SAME, o...
by dougcl
Tue Aug 10, 2010 4:01 pm
Forum: IBM<sup>®</sup> DataStage Enterprise Edition (Formerly Parallel Extender/PX)
Topic: Removing the warning. "will partition despite the prese
Replies: 5
Views: 4776

I don't understand why the flag has to be cleared on all inputs. Seems to me any inputs with a partitioning strategy of SAME should not lead to the warning, but they do.
by dougcl
Thu Aug 05, 2010 1:42 pm
Forum: IBM<sup>®</sup> DataStage Enterprise Edition (Formerly Parallel Extender/PX)
Topic: Fatal Error: Updatable lookup requires sorted keys.
Replies: 8
Views: 7199

Hi folks, I think I have this solved. Apparently the error message is correct. If you are doing a range lookup, the reference link must be sorted on the lookup keys. Partition entire first, then sort.

Doug
by dougcl
Mon Aug 02, 2010 5:46 pm
Forum: IBM<sup>®</sup> DataStage Enterprise Edition (Formerly Parallel Extender/PX)
Topic: Fatal Error: Invalid Julian day in Filter Stage
Replies: 5
Views: 5324

add $OSH_PRINT_SCHEMAS to your job and look at the actual schemas going into your filter stage are they actually timestamp? RECORDED_TIME: nullable timestamp; EFFECTIVE_TIME: timestamp; TO_TIME: nullable timestamp; Doing the obvious and removing "nullable" led to a null error, so I think ...