Search found 137 matches
- Fri Aug 27, 2010 12:00 pm
- Forum:
- Topic: Table Definitions vs Database Tables
- Replies: 3
- Views: 1499
Check this out.... http://dsrealtime.wordpress.com/2010/07/02/what-are-shared-table-definitions/ Ernie Hi ernie, one quick question, referring to your article and the list of import methods you describe, what is the behavior of MW when a table is imported that already exists? In the case of the DS ...
- Fri Aug 27, 2010 11:45 am
- Forum:
- Topic: Shared Tables in MW
- Replies: 9
- Views: 4416
Hi Ernie, I still don't know how to connect Cognos to MW. It looks like the easiest way is to go through Cognos Go! In the Business Glossary setup. We are getting the gosearch function installed on our Cognos server for this purpose. We don't have Fast Track (IBM gave us the impression that this was...
- Thu Aug 26, 2010 7:54 pm
- Forum:
- Topic: Table Definitions vs Database Tables
- Replies: 3
- Views: 1499
Table Definitions vs Database Tables
Hi folks, I am a little confused about the role of Table Definitions in MW. While they are critical in DataStage, and I can see them in MW, and I can see what stages depend on them in Workbench, there is no option to show lineage or impacts on them in WB. Furthermore, they don't appear in any impact...
- Thu Aug 26, 2010 7:46 pm
- Forum:
- Topic: Shared Tables in MW
- Replies: 9
- Views: 4416
Hi folks, what is the recommended workflow with MW and DataStage? Do I import Oracle tables into MW and then cascade them down to DataStage? Do all imports and updates happen directly on MW? Or do I import into DataStage and share them up to MW? Seems this doesn't work because updates to Table Defs ...
- Wed Aug 25, 2010 6:13 pm
- Forum: IBM<sup>®</sup> DataStage Enterprise Edition (Formerly Parallel Extender/PX)
- Topic: Scheduler Error loading connector library libccora10g.
- Replies: 5
- Views: 4465
- Wed Aug 25, 2010 6:12 pm
- Forum: IBM<sup>®</sup> DataStage Enterprise Edition (Formerly Parallel Extender/PX)
- Topic: Reducing Swap Usage in Simple Jobs
- Replies: 9
- Views: 2794
- Wed Aug 25, 2010 12:33 am
- Forum: IBM<sup>®</sup> DataStage Enterprise Edition (Formerly Parallel Extender/PX)
- Topic: Reducing Swap Usage in Simple Jobs
- Replies: 9
- Views: 2794
You can certainly tune memory in the Sort stage, up or down, but if the system is already swapping heavily I'd be more inclined to figure out what's causing that. Is it genuine swap (to system swap space) or is it usage of the scratchdisk resources mentioned in your configuration file? If the latte...
- Wed Aug 25, 2010 12:24 am
- Forum: IBM<sup>®</sup> DataStage Enterprise Edition (Formerly Parallel Extender/PX)
- Topic: Scheduler Error loading connector library libccora10g.
- Replies: 5
- Views: 4465
- Tue Aug 24, 2010 5:53 pm
- Forum: IBM<sup>®</sup> DataStage Enterprise Edition (Formerly Parallel Extender/PX)
- Topic: Scheduler Error loading connector library libccora10g.
- Replies: 5
- Views: 4465
Scheduler Error loading connector library libccora10g.
Hi folks, everything runs fine firing things off from Director manually, but scheduled jobs fail with Error loading connector library libccora10g.so I chased this down to the cron process requiring the LD_LIBRARY_PATH specified in $DSHOME/dsenv, but I'm not sure where to go from here. Has anyone sol...
- Tue Aug 24, 2010 5:43 pm
- Forum: IBM<sup>®</sup> DataStage Enterprise Edition (Formerly Parallel Extender/PX)
- Topic: Reducing Swap Usage in Simple Jobs
- Replies: 9
- Views: 2794
Hi folks, any idea why simple jobs of the form Oracle Connector->Sort->Dataset consume 3.2GB of swap space per instance, independent of the amount of data they are transferring? Perhaps more simply, are there parameters I can tune (like limit MB in the sort stage) to reduce this footprint? Thanks, D...
- Mon Aug 23, 2010 6:33 pm
- Forum: IBM<sup>®</sup> DataStage Enterprise Edition (Formerly Parallel Extender/PX)
- Topic: Reducing Swap Usage in Simple Jobs
- Replies: 9
- Views: 2794
Reducing Swap Usage in Simple Jobs
Hi folks, I have a bunch of very simple extract jobs. OracleConnector->Sort->DataSet. With 16 partitions, I am finding that each one of these jobs requires about 3.2GB of swap space (based on using vmstat while the jobs are running). At this rate I consume all 30GB of my "available" swap a...
- Tue Aug 10, 2010 4:10 pm
- Forum: IBM<sup>®</sup> DataStage Enterprise Edition (Formerly Parallel Extender/PX)
- Topic: Removing the warning. "will partition despite the prese
- Replies: 5
- Views: 4776
Providing SAME partition would never creates this warning. But when you dont want the same partition as the previous stage? When you end up in re-partitioning? What I find is that if any input requires a repartition, then all of the inputs must have the flag cleared, even if they are set to SAME, o...
- Tue Aug 10, 2010 4:01 pm
- Forum: IBM<sup>®</sup> DataStage Enterprise Edition (Formerly Parallel Extender/PX)
- Topic: Removing the warning. "will partition despite the prese
- Replies: 5
- Views: 4776
- Thu Aug 05, 2010 1:42 pm
- Forum: IBM<sup>®</sup> DataStage Enterprise Edition (Formerly Parallel Extender/PX)
- Topic: Fatal Error: Updatable lookup requires sorted keys.
- Replies: 8
- Views: 7199
- Mon Aug 02, 2010 5:46 pm
- Forum: IBM<sup>®</sup> DataStage Enterprise Edition (Formerly Parallel Extender/PX)
- Topic: Fatal Error: Invalid Julian day in Filter Stage
- Replies: 5
- Views: 5324