Search found 135 matches
- Tue May 10, 2011 3:51 am
- Forum: IBM<sup>®</sup> DataStage Enterprise Edition (Formerly Parallel Extender/PX)
- Topic: surrogate key generator generating improper sequence
- Replies: 7
- Views: 2929
- Mon May 09, 2011 11:08 pm
- Forum: IBM<sup>®</sup> DataStage Enterprise Edition (Formerly Parallel Extender/PX)
- Topic: surrogate key generator generating improper sequence
- Replies: 7
- Views: 2929
surrogate key generator generating improper sequence
I have a job that runs on 2 nodes.I created the statefile through the surrogate key generator stage create option. I tried to generate the sequence numbers for 107 source records. The numbers were generated as 1 - 53 on node1 1001-1054 on node2 I was expecting that the sequence numbers would be from...
- Mon May 09, 2011 5:28 am
- Forum: IBM<sup>®</sup> DataStage Enterprise Edition (Formerly Parallel Extender/PX)
- Topic: Can .txt file contain null value?
- Replies: 10
- Views: 9232
Re: Can .txt file contain null value?
NULL means unknown value and empty means there is no value.A text file can have empty but it cannot have NULLs.if a field is empty or possible to be empty then select the option Null field value=''
and make the possible columns to NULL yes
and make the possible columns to NULL yes
- Thu May 05, 2011 1:14 am
- Forum: IBM<sup>®</sup> DataStage Enterprise Edition (Formerly Parallel Extender/PX)
- Topic: Need to eliminate warning on timestamp
- Replies: 4
- Views: 8857
- Thu May 05, 2011 12:49 am
- Forum: IBM<sup>®</sup> DataStage Enterprise Edition (Formerly Parallel Extender/PX)
- Topic: Error:No default type conversion from type "timestamp[m
- Replies: 5
- Views: 4276
- Thu May 05, 2011 12:25 am
- Forum: IBM<sup>®</sup> DataStage Enterprise Edition (Formerly Parallel Extender/PX)
- Topic: Need to eliminate warning on timestamp
- Replies: 4
- Views: 8857
- Wed May 04, 2011 7:19 am
- Forum: IBM<sup>®</sup> DataStage Enterprise Edition (Formerly Parallel Extender/PX)
- Topic: Need to eliminate warning on timestamp
- Replies: 4
- Views: 8857
Need to eliminate warning on timestamp
I am using a column EFF_DT timestamp ,microseconds length 27, and scale 7.In SQL Server it is defined as DATETIME2(7).When i ran the job i found the warning below and we should not have a single warning in our jobs as per rules.Please suggest a solution to eliminate this "Schema reconciliation ...
- Wed May 04, 2011 5:46 am
- Forum: IBM<sup>®</sup> DataStage Enterprise Edition (Formerly Parallel Extender/PX)
- Topic: Error:No default type conversion from type "timestamp[m
- Replies: 5
- Views: 4276
- Wed May 04, 2011 5:44 am
- Forum: IBM<sup>®</sup> DataStage Enterprise Edition (Formerly Parallel Extender/PX)
- Topic: Error : Null handling done on not nullable column
- Replies: 10
- Views: 3960
If you are on a version earlier than 8.5 it matters hugely to the Transformer stage - all functions in the Transformer stage other than the null-handling functions are intolerant of null. ... I am confused, as I have been thinking that tranformer checks the field for nulls only on the output link o...
- Wed May 04, 2011 3:48 am
- Forum: IBM<sup>®</sup> DataStage Enterprise Edition (Formerly Parallel Extender/PX)
- Topic: Error:No default type conversion from type "timestamp[m
- Replies: 5
- Views: 4276
Error:No default type conversion from type "timestamp[m
I am reading a timestamp (microseconds) column from an SQL server table and using it as akey in the lookup stage following ODBC Enterprise stage.The job is aborting with an error "No default type conversion from type "timestamp[microseconds]" to type "ustring[max=32]". But n...
- Wed May 04, 2011 3:42 am
- Forum: IBM<sup>®</sup> DataStage Enterprise Edition (Formerly Parallel Extender/PX)
- Topic: Error : Null handling done on not nullable column
- Replies: 10
- Views: 3960
- Wed May 04, 2011 12:16 am
- Forum: IBM<sup>®</sup> DataStage Enterprise Edition (Formerly Parallel Extender/PX)
- Topic: Error : Null handling done on not nullable column
- Replies: 10
- Views: 3960
Error : Null handling done on not nullable column
I have a lookup stage and I am pulling a flag that has value 'Y', from the reference and checking for NULLs for that field in the constraint of the transformer following lookup. I am using IsNull(Flag) in the constraint.I am getting the error "Null Handling done on not nullable field" but ...
- Thu Apr 28, 2011 3:20 am
- Forum: IBM<sup>®</sup> DataStage Enterprise Edition (Formerly Parallel Extender/PX)
- Topic: Sequence on the output from an aggregator stage
- Replies: 3
- Views: 2005
Re: Sequence on the output from an aggregator stage
Use the first and second columns in sort as sorting keys in descending order and generate the sequence numbers until the value in the key col1(1000) is changed.That can be achieved using stage variables in the transformer
- Wed Apr 27, 2011 12:26 am
- Forum: IBM<sup>®</sup> DataStage Enterprise Edition (Formerly Parallel Extender/PX)
- Topic: same partition after a sequential file stage??
- Replies: 3
- Views: 2318
Thanks Ray for your reply.Partition occurs only on input link but in this scenario what parition would same partition invoke? Since I am not a premium member ,I could understand from your reply that 1 file per partition at the sequential file stage and the same is applied to copy stage but what abou...
- Wed Apr 27, 2011 12:05 am
- Forum: IBM<sup>®</sup> DataStage Enterprise Edition (Formerly Parallel Extender/PX)
- Topic: same partition after a sequential file stage??
- Replies: 3
- Views: 2318
same partition after a sequential file stage??
This is not an interview question and is just for my understanding. A sequential file stage is executed in parallel(file pattern) and there is a data link to copy stage and then to dataset.The copy stage by default uses same partition.As per the defintion of same parition it has to apply the preceed...