Hi Julio,
Were you able to migrate the metadata repository from DB2 to Oracle? Would you kindly let us know how you did the migration as we're planning to do a similar task.
Thank you.
Search found 16 matches
- Thu Feb 24, 2011 1:27 pm
- Forum: General
- Topic: Metada repository migration from DB2 to Oracle 10g/11g(RAC)
- Replies: 1
- Views: 1861
- Thu Jan 15, 2009 7:17 pm
- Forum: IBM<sup>®</sup> DataStage Enterprise Edition (Formerly Parallel Extender/PX)
- Topic: Datastage v 7.x on Linux 64-bit
- Replies: 4
- Views: 2065
- Wed Jan 14, 2009 1:26 pm
- Forum: IBM<sup>®</sup> DataStage Enterprise Edition (Formerly Parallel Extender/PX)
- Topic: Datastage v 7.x on Linux 64-bit
- Replies: 4
- Views: 2065
- Tue Aug 14, 2007 9:17 pm
- Forum: IBM<sup>®</sup> DataStage Enterprise Edition (Formerly Parallel Extender/PX)
- Topic: C++ Compiler for version 8
- Replies: 1
- Views: 1515
C++ Compiler for version 8
We have linkxlC on AIX5.3. We installed Information Server - DataStage 8.0.1. The compiler environment variables were set to: APT_COMPILER = /usr/vacapp/bin/xlC_r APT_COMPILE_OPTIONS = -O -m APT_LINKER = /usr/vacapp/bin/xlC_r APT_LINKER_OPTIONS = -G The job with the transformer did not compile thoug...
- Wed Jul 11, 2007 6:23 am
- Forum: IBM<sup>®</sup> SOA Editions (Formerly RTI Services)
- Topic: RTI job instances do no die
- Replies: 5
- Views: 4396
- Tue Jul 10, 2007 9:37 pm
- Forum: IBM<sup>®</sup> SOA Editions (Formerly RTI Services)
- Topic: RTI job instances do no die
- Replies: 5
- Views: 4396
- Fri Jul 06, 2007 6:39 pm
- Forum: IBM<sup>®</sup> SOA Editions (Formerly RTI Services)
- Topic: RTI job instances do no die
- Replies: 5
- Views: 4396
RTI job instances do no die
We have an RTI job that is "Always On" that runs on a minimum of 4 instances, maximum of 10. The job design is RTI Input -----> Stages --------> RTI Output Service requests as of now is very low, up to 2500 per day on small bursts every 5 minutes. The problem we have now is, there are job ...
- Wed Mar 21, 2007 10:34 am
- Forum: IBM<sup>®</sup> DataStage Enterprise Edition (Formerly Parallel Extender/PX)
- Topic: Options for handling a NULL field
- Replies: 6
- Views: 3708
I tried using Handle_Null as above but it doesn't work. TRANSACTION_DATE=Handle_Null(TRANSACTION_DATE,CREATED_TIMESTAMP) TRANSACTION_DATE AND CREATED_TIMESTAMP are TIMESTAMP columns The job fails with the following error: check_nulls: Error when checking operator: When binding output schema variable...
- Tue Mar 20, 2007 12:23 pm
- Forum: IBM<sup>®</sup> DataStage Enterprise Edition (Formerly Parallel Extender/PX)
- Topic: Modify Stage- DaysSinceFromDate syntax
- Replies: 13
- Views: 10125
- Tue Aug 09, 2005 3:08 pm
- Forum: IBM<sup>®</sup> DataStage Enterprise Edition (Formerly Parallel Extender/PX)
- Topic: Null detection after joiner
- Replies: 10
- Views: 7342
You should be able to get what you want with change capture. We have jobs with quite the same logic and it works fine. This is how we implement the job. after ---> cdc --> transformer ↑ ↓ ----> funnel before ---> copy -------> join Split 'before' data so you can keep the old columns. In your transfo...
- Mon Aug 08, 2005 11:13 am
- Forum: IBM<sup>®</sup> DataStage Enterprise Edition (Formerly Parallel Extender/PX)
- Topic: Writing to dataset
- Replies: 1
- Views: 1201
Writing to dataset
Hi! I am appending to a dataset and I want to keep the partitioning on the dataset. My dataset is hash-partitioned on Key1. If I append to the dataset, will it keep the same keys on the same partition? I would think the sorting will be lost, is that correct? I'm planning to hash-partition on Key1 pr...
- Thu Jul 07, 2005 2:30 pm
- Forum: IBM<sup>®</sup> DataStage Enterprise Edition (Formerly Parallel Extender/PX)
- Topic: Checkpoint restart
- Replies: 15
- Views: 9352
benny.lbs' case happens to us too and restart only works for 1 level down the top sequence. When one of the grandchildren fails, all the jobs under the level 2 that finished successfully prior to the abort runs again when restarted. All our sequences have these properties: -'Add checkpoints..' is en...
- Fri Jul 23, 2004 3:46 pm
- Forum: IBM<sup>®</sup> Infosphere DataStage Server Edition
- Topic: Aborted Child Jobs in not detected from Parent Job Sequence
- Replies: 15
- Views: 7905
We decided not to use the functionality. :( Instead, we put another SEQUENCER that triggers a common Routine for aborting jobs when ANY of the child sequences fail. I tried using the Exception Handler but it behaves exactly as when 'Automatic handle activities that fail' is checked. Btw, the routine...
- Fri Jul 23, 2004 8:43 am
- Forum: IBM<sup>®</sup> Infosphere DataStage Server Edition
- Topic: Aborted Child Jobs in not detected from Parent Job Sequence
- Replies: 15
- Views: 7905
- Fri Jul 23, 2004 8:29 am
- Forum: IBM<sup>®</sup> Infosphere DataStage Server Edition
- Topic: Aborted Child Jobs in not detected from Parent Job Sequence
- Replies: 15
- Views: 7905
We tried using 'Automatically handle activities that fail' (v7.1) and the Master Sequence aborts when the child sequences abort. This is ok when the routine activity in the Master Sequence returns zero. However, when the routine activity returns non-zero, the Master Sequence fails when it should not...