Search found 51 matches

by kirannumb
Mon Mar 23, 2015 8:59 pm
Forum: IBM<sup>®</sup> DataStage Enterprise Edition (Formerly Parallel Extender/PX)
Topic: Implementation of the While Loop logic in the job
Replies: 1
Views: 1836

Implementation of the While Loop logic in the job

Hello Gurus, How can we implement "while loop" logic in the job ? I am familiar with implementing looping in transformer but not quite sure how to go about implementing the looping for the below while loop inside the stored procedure: DECLARE @pnum int SELECT @pnum = 0 DECLARE @vendor_id v...
by kirannumb
Fri May 13, 2011 12:33 pm
Forum: IBM<sup>®</sup> DataStage Enterprise Edition (Formerly Parallel Extender/PX)
Topic: Meta Data Extended
Replies: 6
Views: 3307

Yes the Unicode is defined at Project level. My Problem is that I have done the development. I have no prob even if it is there (as Unicode) but just to avoid some warning in Jobs I want to get rid of it in a more efficient way rather then in a hard way of doing it as suggested. I tried it by modif...
by kirannumb
Fri Jul 16, 2010 12:05 pm
Forum: IBM<sup>®</sup> DataStage Enterprise Edition (Formerly Parallel Extender/PX)
Topic: Equivalent function for DIGITS in Parallel
Replies: 4
Views: 2247

anbu wrote:

Code: Select all

Convert(Convert('0123456789','',REFERENCE_NUMBER),'',REFERENCE_NUMBER)
Thanks for the reply. In the above code '0123456789' represents DIGITS and your are suggesting to replace DIGITS(DSLink8.REFERENCE_NUMBER) wit the above code ?
by kirannumb
Fri Jul 16, 2010 10:37 am
Forum: IBM<sup>®</sup> DataStage Enterprise Edition (Formerly Parallel Extender/PX)
Topic: Equivalent function for DIGITS in Parallel
Replies: 4
Views: 2247

Equivalent function for DIGITS in Parallel

Hi All,


I am trying to find equivalent function for DIGITS function in Parallel jobs. I have the following in the Server job:

link.Column_NUMBER : DIGITS(link.REFERENCE_NUMBER)

Can anyone please post the equivalent function.

Thanks
by kirannumb
Thu Jun 10, 2010 7:41 pm
Forum: IBM<sup>®</sup> DataStage Enterprise Edition (Formerly Parallel Extender/PX)
Topic: Warning Concern -- masking of an error
Replies: 3
Views: 2264

Message handlers are based on the Message ID. Only that particular message ID will be masked. And only in jobs for which the message handler is loaded. ... Yes true. I am just concern to know whether masking this particular warning will never mask an error so that there will not be a change in the ...
by kirannumb
Thu Jun 10, 2010 2:52 pm
Forum: IBM<sup>®</sup> DataStage Enterprise Edition (Formerly Parallel Extender/PX)
Topic: OCI,0: (aptoci.C:460). Message: ORA-01722: invalid number
Replies: 7
Views: 4396

Make sure you check Allow Multiple Instance in Job Parameters.
by kirannumb
Thu Jun 10, 2010 11:14 am
Forum: IBM<sup>®</sup> DataStage Enterprise Edition (Formerly Parallel Extender/PX)
Topic: Warning Concern -- masking of an error
Replies: 3
Views: 2264

Warning Concern -- masking of an error

Hi All,

I have a general question---

We are planning to mask the below warning using Message Handler, I am curious to know if it will mask any error in the future.


cc_stage: When checking operator: Defaulting "X" in transfer from "beforeRec" to "outputRec".
by kirannumb
Fri Jun 04, 2010 2:08 pm
Forum: IBM<sup>®</sup> DataStage Enterprise Edition (Formerly Parallel Extender/PX)
Topic: Warning for Before/Output Record
Replies: 5
Views: 3575

I tried but it didn't work. I handled the warnings using Message Handler.
by kirannumb
Fri Jun 04, 2010 2:06 pm
Forum: IBM<sup>®</sup> DataStage Enterprise Edition (Formerly Parallel Extender/PX)
Topic: Aggregator Warning
Replies: 1
Views: 1418

Aggregator Warning

Hi All, I am getting the following warning, which I think it is a problem with data type. I tried several combinations but it is not working, can someone please tell me the equivalent data type for dfloat ? This warning is from the Aggregator stage where I am trying to get the RowCount. agg_CountofC...
by kirannumb
Wed Jun 02, 2010 1:54 pm
Forum: IBM<sup>®</sup> DataStage Enterprise Edition (Formerly Parallel Extender/PX)
Topic: Warning for Before/Output Record
Replies: 5
Views: 3575

I am getting this warning in Change Capture stage where the 2 input links to the stage differ a bit in the metadata. From Change capture I have a transformer and there are 2 output links.... one link has just one column to count rows using aggregator and other reads into a file with different column...
by kirannumb
Tue Jun 01, 2010 5:00 pm
Forum: IBM<sup>®</sup> DataStage Enterprise Edition (Formerly Parallel Extender/PX)
Topic: Warning for Before/Output Record
Replies: 5
Views: 3575

It is in the Change Capture stage. RCP is not enabled.
by kirannumb
Tue Jun 01, 2010 4:37 pm
Forum: IBM<sup>®</sup> DataStage Enterprise Edition (Formerly Parallel Extender/PX)
Topic: Warning for Before/Output Record
Replies: 5
Views: 3575

Warning for Before/Output Record

Hi

I am getting the following warning, any suggestions on how to remove:

cc_Address: When checking operator: Defaulting "ColumnName" in transfer from "beforeRec" to "outputRec".
by kirannumb
Tue Jun 01, 2010 4:28 pm
Forum: IBM QualityStage
Topic: Warning in QualityStage job
Replies: 3
Views: 2540

ray.wurlod wrote:Take a look at the metadata on both sides of the MatchAddress stage.

A flag never really needs to be bigger than a TinyInt (uint8). ...
Thanks Ray. It worked I changed the SQL type to TinyInt and warnings are gone.
by kirannumb
Tue Jun 01, 2010 3:20 pm
Forum: IBM QualityStage
Topic: Warning in QualityStage job
Replies: 3
Views: 2540

Warning in QualityStage job

Hi All, I am getting the following warning and finding hard to remove can anyone please guide me to the destiny. MatchAddress: When checking operator: When binding input interface field "qsFreqHeaderFlag" to field "qsFreqHeaderFlag": Implicit conversion from source type "uin...
by kirannumb
Wed May 05, 2010 4:48 pm
Forum: IBM<sup>®</sup> DataStage Enterprise Edition (Formerly Parallel Extender/PX)
Topic: Repeated Warning in a job
Replies: 6
Views: 4481

srinivas.g wrote:In modify stage mentioned like Specification=NOWARN.
It will go automatically no need for message handler.

Thanks for the input srinivas. I tried your approach but the warning got doubled, I mentioned NOWARN in Specification. Please validate my approach..